Teams

CMTA @ Liberty Hills-McManus

2021 Winter League-Saturday · 4.0W Saturday

15 players · average NTRP 4.20 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-03-27vs Ivory Ridge-LangstonWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Woolley / Kalee King vs Sherilyn Rawlings / Traci Church6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesArashan Heikkila / Miglena Aaron vs Cary Jones / Joanna Larsen6-4, 4-1
2021-03-20vs Sports Mall-Fuhrman/BroadbentWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Woolley / Kalee King vs Tiffany Kasteler / Terry Miya7-5, 5-3
W#2 DoublesDorene Sambado / Beth Iucker vs Sheila Benson / Jamie Harris7-5, 3-2
2021-03-13vs CMTA @ Oak Hills-BrownWon 20
W#1 DoublesArashan Heikkila / Catherine Bliss vs Kristen Treanor / Carolee Romney6-3, 5-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Woolley / Rachel Lamont vs Meagan Williams / Amy Powell6-3, 6-0
2021-03-06vs Ivory Ridge-LangstonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesArashan Heikkila / Kimberly Simpson vs Jen Langston / Amy Boren6-7, 1-4
W#2 DoublesDorene Sambado / Kalee King vs Traci Church / Sherilyn Rawlings6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-02-27vs Sports Mall-Fuhrman/BroadbentWon 20
W#1 DoublesMegan Rytting / Kimberly Simpson vs Sara Green / Terry Miya6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCassandra Suite-Smith / Amy Woolley vs Terry Houston / Kim Levine6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-02-20vs CMTA @ Oak Hills-BrownWon 30
W#1 DoublesCatherine Bliss / Kimberly Simpson vs Carolee Romney / Kristen Treanor4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Woolley / Rachel Lamont vs Christy Owens / Amy Powell6-1, 6-5
W#3 DoublesMegan Rytting / Kalee King vs Jessika Brown / Jordyn Parry6-4, 3-1
2021-02-06vs Ivory Ridge-LangstonWon 20
W#1 DoublesCassandra Suite-Smith / Amy Woolley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMiglena Aaron / Khet Hanson vs Janee Roper / Jodie Monson7-6, 6-1
2021-01-30vs Sports Mall-Fuhrman/BroadbentWon 30
W#1 DoublesArashan Heikkila / Kimberly Simpson vs Jamie Harris / Debi Green6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Woolley / Rachel Lamont vs Kim Levine / Terry Houston6-4, 4-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDorene Sambado / Virag White vs Paula Fuhrman / Sheila Benson3-6, 4-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Kimberly Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.28
Amy Woolley
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.17
Arashan Heikkila
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.15
Alessandra Nolan
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.00
Rachel Lamont
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.90
Catherine Bliss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Kalee King
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Dorene Sambado
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Katie Leikin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Miglena Aaron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Ashley Korchyk
published 4
3.50
Cassandra Suite-Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Khet Hanson
published
Megan Rytting
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Regen McManus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Woolley + Kalee King9061% games+9.0% vs expected
Arashan Heikkila + Megan Rytting5158% games+8.1% vs expected
Catherine Bliss + Megan Rytting7163% games+7.0% vs expected
Catherine Bliss + Arashan Heikkila301455% games+3.1% vs expected
Catherine Bliss + Kimberly Simpson12557% games+2.3% vs expected
Kimberly Simpson + Arashan Heikkila30663% games+1.9% vs expected
Kimberly Simpson + Megan Rytting314 matchesnot enough data
Amy Woolley + Rachel Lamont303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Simpson
144W–57L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Amy Woolley
192W–98L career · 7 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Arashan Heikkila
188W–76L career · 4 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Alessandra Nolan
93W–60L career · 7 lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Rachel Lamont
44W–47L career · 3 lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Catherine Bliss
239W–169L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Kalee King
117W–93L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Dorene Sambado
102W–113L career · 3 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Katie Leikin
104W–125L career · 6 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
Miglena Aaron
39W–51L career · 2 lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Ashley Korchyk
1W–6L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Cassandra Suite-Smith
43W–54L career · 1 line in 2021
50%50%<1%
3.50
Khet Hanson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Megan Rytting
100W–30L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Regen McManus
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.