Teams

DWEILAND

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-06vs IHWilliamsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bricker / Leigh Kimball vs Melanie Jones / Louisa Garvey2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJean Haas / Susan Flanagan vs Helen Williams / Hilary Kuss1-6, 3-6
2022-09-29vs KMCKEE18+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAveril Glover / Dana Weiland vs Kimberly Boyd / Karen McKee4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Boyd / Jean Haas vs Laura Holt-Kabel / Jaime Szymusiak1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLeigh Kimball / Rosemary Peters vs Fran Ange / Carol Muth6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-09-22vs KPatreyWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bricker / Leigh Kimball vs Susan Fanelly / Donna Bauman2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDana Weiland / Kathryn Beth Beam vs Jeme Avent / Jacqueline Ritchey6-3, 5-2
W#3 DoublesAveril Glover / Judy Tarlton vs Kimberly Patrey / Bonnie McDaniel6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-15vs APenaLost 02
L#1 DoublesDana Weiland / Jean Haas vs Julie Tuttle / Alissa Hennen1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAveril Glover / Wendy Kay vs Susan Dubach / Kate Whitney2-6, 6-7
2022-09-08vs KRiceLost 01
L#1 DoublesDana Weiland / Leigh Kimball vs Alex Gormley / Marybeth Margolis2-6, 6-7
2022-09-01vs LManweiler18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bricker / Dana Weiland vs Michelle Vedder / Lynne Manweiler2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Beth Beam / Averil Glover vs Sarah Mulligan / Lisa ONeill6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-08-25vs pmccollumSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathryn Beth Beam / Dana Weiland vs Gillian Sellick / Cherie Scholes7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTiffany Harris / Jean Haas vs Karen Thurston / Jenny Nguyen6-4, 6-3
2022-08-18vs ESanchezLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bricker / Tiffany Harris vs Fran Poole / Mabel Pace2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAveril Glover / Rosemary Peters vs Elisabeth Sanchez / Tina Glover1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-08-11vs RMillsLost 02
L#2 DoublesJennifer Boyd / Jean Haas vs Helen Harris / Holly Moravec2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJordan Adams / Leigh Kimball vs Michelle Welborn / Sherrie Smith6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Dana Weiland
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.66
Jennifer Bricker
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.51
Leigh Kimball
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.46
Kathryn Beth Beam
published
3.42
Jean Haas
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Averil Glover
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.00
Rosemary Peters
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Bricker + Dana Weiland131050% games−2.4% vs expected
Jennifer Bricker + Leigh Kimball151355% games−3.1% vs expected
Leigh Kimball + Dana Weiland2647% gamesnot enough data
Averil Glover + Dana Weiland2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dana Weiland
171W–127L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Jennifer Bricker
238W–222L career · 7 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Leigh Kimball
57W–73L career · 7 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
Kathryn Beth Beam
4W–14L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Jean Haas
39W–39L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Averil Glover
108W–92L career · 8 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Rosemary Peters
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.