Teams

MAC Scott

2021 Richmond Working Women · Working Women 7.0

5 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-24vs Raintree EntersWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMary Scott / Deirdre Vaughan vs Suzanne Spadafora / Katheryn Enters6-3, 6-0
2021-05-17vs Woodlake HannonWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesSusan Greenspoon / Sabrina Graff vs Mylan Barfield / Diane Thexton6-0, 6-4
W#2 Female DoublesDeirdre Vaughan / Mary Scott vs Robin Oldt / Jayne Deck6-0, 6-2
2021-05-12vs Bon Air RhodesWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesDeirdre Vaughan / Mary Scott vs Martha Rhodes / Nancy Metz5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 Female DoublesSusan Greenspoon / Katherine Clapp vs Janet Miller / Donna Lawson6-4, 6-1
2021-05-10vs Willow Oaks SampsonWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesSusan Greenspoon / Deirdre Vaughan vs Sallie Mayer / Mansi Shah6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2021-04-29vs CCV BealeSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesMary Scott / Deirdre Vaughan vs Kerry DeLacey / Kate Beckler6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 Female DoublesSabrina Graff / Susan Greenspoon vs Paige Forrest / Melanie Cross6-1, 6-4
2021-04-12vs RCC KochWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesSusan Greenspoon / Isabel Lee vs Kathleen Jackson / Nancy Price4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 Female DoublesMary Scott / Deirdre Vaughan vs Jennifer Gnapp / Janis Krausse6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Working Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Susan Greenspoon
usually #1 Female Doubles 60%, also #3 Female Doubles 20% · published
3.29
Mary Scott
published
3.28
Deirdre Vaughan
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Bernice White
published 3
Toni Bolden-Ealey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Greenspoon + Deirdre Vaughan2539% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Greenspoon
178W–113L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%65%35%
3.45
Mary Scott
18W–12L career · no lines in 2021
94%6%<1%
3.29
3.5
Deirdre Vaughan
162W–178L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.28
3
Bernice White
8W–20L career · no lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
2.95
Toni Bolden-Ealey
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.