Teams

Kiwi - Jordan

2022 Brevard Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-18vs Brevard - Desoto / WolszczakLost 01
L#1 DoublesCheri McLachlan / Karin Mann vs Rima Campbell / Joni Smith3-6, 2-6
2022-06-11vs TTC - MarattaWon 10
W#1 DoublesDawn Barlow / Cheri McLachlan vs Donna Andress / Suzanne New6-2, 7-5
2022-05-25vs TTC - McIntoshWon 10
W#1 DoublesDawn Barlow / Kathi Heller vs Sylvia Segura / Amy McIntosh6-0, 6-3
2022-05-14vs TTC - MarattaWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheri McLachlan / Kathi Heller vs Patricia Spoerle / Beth Delgado6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2022-05-07vs Brevard - Desoto / WolszczakLost 02
L#1 DoublesDawn Barlow / Kathi Heller vs Lisa Davidson-DURAN / Taylor Duran3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKarin Mann / Astrid Johnson vs Debbie Sibley / Susan Noble6-7, 2-6
2022-04-30vs TTC - McIntoshLost 02
L#1 DoublesCheri McLachlan / Dawn Barlow vs Michelle Smith / Sherell Teah2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTara Capuano / Astrid Johnson vs Sara Hatfield / Marlee Miller3-6, 5-7
2022-04-23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCheri McLachlan / Tara Capuano vs Stacy Wagner / Linda Stout6-7, 4-6
2022-04-09vs TTC - McIntoshWon 20
W#1 DoublesDawn Barlow / Michele Jordan vs Sylvia Segura / Carol Baggett4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Behm / Astrid Johnson vs Britta Barnby / Marlee Miller6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Dawn Barlow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Astrid Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Bobbi Allebach
published 4
3.55
Cheri McLachlan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.19
Maria Diegnan
published
Danielle Ades
published
Karen Tedder
published
Kimberly Farson
published
Maite Harte
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Astrid Johnson + Cheri McLachlan8461% gamesnot enough data
Cheri McLachlan + Dawn Barlow2352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dawn Barlow
96W–43L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%18%82%
4.12
4
Astrid Johnson
94W–70L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Bobbi Allebach
6W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Cheri McLachlan
158W–138L career · 5 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Maria Diegnan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
Danielle Ades
21W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Tedder
6W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly Farson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maite Harte
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.