Teams

WI Low Tri Mixed Doubles MALT Arreazola

2025 WI Other · WI Low Tri Mixed Doubles

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-05Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJustin Kirkpatrick / Rita Lukey vs Samantha Saetang / Brandon Dosdos2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTyler Garlock / Wendy Cartwright vs Prathap Palaniswamy / Megan Prahl1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesWILLIAM FISCHER / Monica Trepanier vs Hung Manh Nguyen / Amy Moy1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-09-28Won 20
W#1 DoublesRita Lukey / Justin Kirkpatrick vs Caitlin Cleary / Adam Cook6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMonica Trepanier / Tyler Garlock vs Anna Krylova / Brian Katz6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJonathan Lauer / Kaitlin Colver vs Luis Rey / Pallavi Tiwari6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWILLIAM FISCHER / Rachel Hockemeyer vs Krish M / Carre Porter4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBrandon Istad / Monica Trepanier vs Farid Masrour / Nicole Desjardins6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesJustin Kirkpatrick / Alissa Darin vs Erik Dustrude / Elizabeth Yates6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Buzzard / Philip Wong vs Abby Eddy / Chase Peck3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesTyler Garlock / Wendy Cartwright vs Kathleen Spencer / Joe Tegtmeier4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-24Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrandon Istad / Monica Trepanier vs Jon Jenson / Karelyn Hopkins6-1, 6-2
2025-08-17Split 11
L#2 DoublesWILLIAM FISCHER / Kathleen Roach vs Yana Mavlyutov / Edward Halsted6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrandon Istad / Monica Trepanier vs Anna Krylova / Timur Mavlyutov6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesTrish Arreazola / Justin Kirkpatrick vs Erik Dustrude / Zoe Tesone1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesWendy Cartwright / WILLIAM FISCHER vs Daniel DeJarlais / Kathleen Spencer6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Low Tri Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Alissa Darin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Trish Arreazola
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Rita Lukey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Stephen Territo
published
3.64
Kaitlin Colver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Christian Voskuil
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.53
Jonathan Lauer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Susan Buzzard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Brandon Istad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.38
Joyce Coury
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Philip Wong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Wendy Cartwright
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Rachel Hockemeyer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.81
Monica Trepanier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Tyler Garlock
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Justin Kirkpatrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Roach
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lindsey Kalis
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
WILLIAM FISCHER
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Trepanier + Rachel Hockemeyer6551% games+2.3% vs expected
Rita Lukey + Kaitlin Colver5455% games−6.4% vs expected
Alissa Darin + Rita Lukey4161% gamesnot enough data
Brandon Istad + Monica Trepanier303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alissa Darin
48W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Trish Arreazola
51W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Rita Lukey
94W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Stephen Territo
6W–14L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Kaitlin Colver
15W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Christian Voskuil
16W–12L career · type S · 7 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.54
Jonathan Lauer
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
Susan Buzzard
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
3
Brandon Istad
38W–20L career · type M · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
3.5
Joyce Coury
112W–86L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.38
Philip Wong
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.30
3.5
Wendy Cartwright
52W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Rachel Hockemeyer
54W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Monica Trepanier
62W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Tyler Garlock
22W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Justin Kirkpatrick
14W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Roach
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsey Kalis
8W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
WILLIAM FISCHER
16W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.