Teams

YTC-Yakima Net Setters

2021 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-08-01vs PC-Happy HourLost 12
L#1 DoublesKarl Lieberknecht / Cristeen Valicoff vs Joyce Donais / Don Donais1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAaron McLean / Liberty McLean vs Lindy Bentley / Randy Gable2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEric Rasmussen / Elizabeth Coon vs Cheryl Cooley / James Kirkham1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-07-31vs YTC-BeyerWon 21
L#1 DoublesLiberty McLean / Aaron McLean vs Quinn Plant / Kristin Preacher2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDanny Mullins / Elizabeth Coon vs Scott Jacky / Megan Tweedy6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJody Snyder / Eric Rasmussen vs Tyler Newman / Molly Beyer6-3, 6-4
2021-07-31vs YTC-MILLER TIMELost 12
L#1 DoublesKarl Lieberknecht / Cristeen Valicoff vs Jim Miller / Audrey James1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLiberty McLean / Aaron McLean vs Craig Richardson / Angie Richardson2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJody Snyder / Eric Rasmussen vs Robert Wing / Lisa Watkins6-3, 6-1
2021-07-30vs CBRC-SamuelLost 03
L#1 DoublesDanny Mullins / Elizabeth Coon vs Kristina Berg / Todd Samuel4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLiberty McLean / Karl Lieberknecht vs Jolene Boughton / Evan Mehlenbacher3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEric Rasmussen / Jody Snyder vs Angela Cragin / Adam Hrebeniuk1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Danny Mullins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Cristeen Valicoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Eric Rasmussen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Karl Lieberknecht
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.17
Jody Snyder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Elizabeth Coon
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Aaron McLean
published
Liberty McLean
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jody Snyder + Eric Rasmussen3443% games−10.3% vs expected
Karl Lieberknecht + Cristeen Valicoff033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danny Mullins
33W–53L career · type A · 2 lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Cristeen Valicoff
15W–16L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Eric Rasmussen
9W–9L career · type S · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Karl Lieberknecht
35W–50L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%7%93%
3.19
3.5
Jody Snyder
50W–51L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
3
Elizabeth Coon
20W–20L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
2.90
Aaron McLean
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Liberty McLean
28W–25L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.