Teams

FoleyDay - Biloxi

2024 Adult 18 & Over-GC · Women 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.88 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-05-07vs TOCC-AdamsWon 21
W#1 DoublesDaisy Watson McCarroll / Sydney Papke vs Carla Cleary / Cynthia Render-Leach6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKatie Brandon vs Anne Adams4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Foley / Andrea May vs Sue Battaile / Lori Dewitt6-2, 6-0
2024-04-18vs TOCC-AdamsWon 30
W#1 DoublesDanna Day / Lynette Cooper vs Anne Adams / Jennifer Maisano6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Vuyovich / Jane Ardito vs Shari Pol / Robbie Wrigley6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSydney Papke / Andrea May vs Lori Dewitt / Sue Battaile6-4, 6-0
2024-02-20vs TOCC-AdamsWon 21
W#1 DoublesDaisy Watson McCarroll / Sydney Papke vs Carla Cleary / Penny Westfaul6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Marcel / Amy Vuyovich vs Cynthia Render-Leach / Jennifer Maisano6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesTana Cooper vs Jenny Carroll7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Danna Day
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Laura Marcel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Lynette Cooper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Karah Brown
published
Amy Vuyovich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Andrea May
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Daisy Watson McCarroll
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.62
Jane Ardito
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Tana Cooper
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.49
3.22
Katie Brandon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Michelle Foley
published
Reagan Mroz
published
Sydney Papke
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danna Day + Lynette Cooper9355% games−2.3% vs expected
Danna Day + Jane Ardito314 matchesnot enough data
Katie Brandon + Andrea May224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Danna Day
42W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.96
Laura Marcel
24W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.88
Lynette Cooper
79W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
Karah Brown
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Amy Vuyovich
18W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Andrea May
50W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.74
3.5
Daisy Watson McCarroll
55W–18L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.67
Jane Ardito
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.62
Tana Cooper
30W–34L career · 1 line in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.60
Margaret Morgan-Bowman
9W–16L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
Katie Brandon
28W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
Michelle Foley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Reagan Mroz
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sydney Papke
4W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.