Teams

MCTA 3.0W 65 & Over (Bosselman)

Adult 65 & Over · Adult Women 65 & Over- 3.0

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Adult Women 65 & Over- 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCTA 3.0W 65 & Over (Bosselman)000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Karen Davies
published
Debby Bosselman
published 3
Mildred Hurd
published 3
2.61
Joanne Ward
published
2.47
Karen Garland
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mildred Hurd + Debby Bosselman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Davies
31W–34L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Debby Bosselman
18W–46L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Mildred Hurd
44W–58L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Joanne Ward
4W–14L career · no lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.61
Karen Garland
12W–23L career · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.