Teams

Hammond

2025 Mixed Tri-Level 18 & Over · Mx 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ST. LOUIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Mx 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
William Claypool
published
4.13
Daniel Schneller
published 4.5
4.12
Trinity Lopez
published
3.98
3.80
Ryan Papproth
published
3.70
Michelle Hoxsey
published
3.69
Jay Lyons
published
3.43
Smeet Merchant
published
3.39
Miles Yetter
published
3.39
Sean Bracken
published
3.07
Roberta Barron
published
3.04
Kimberly Hammond
published
2.82
Michelle DuClos
published
Jack Nicholl
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Smeet Merchant + Trinity Lopez16161% games+9.9% vs expected
Ryan Papproth + Kimberly Hammond224 matchesnot enough data
Roberta Barron + Miles Yetter033 matchesnot enough data
Jack Nicholl + Kimberly Hammond033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Claypool
51W–20L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Daniel Schneller
81W–52L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.13
Trinity Lopez
162W–51L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.12
Libby Benoist Claypool
22W–25L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.98
Ryan Papproth
152W–62L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.80
Michelle Hoxsey
98W–65L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Jay Lyons
119W–135L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Smeet Merchant
162W–98L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Miles Yetter
79W–62L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Sean Bracken
33W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Roberta Barron
31W–75L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Kimberly Hammond
51W–153L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
Michelle DuClos
61W–45L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Jack Nicholl
9W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.