Teams

GFU-Beilstein

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Karen Ohollaren
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Emily McBride
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Michelle Beilstein
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.78
Kris Kelly-Koster
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.29
Trina Newcomb
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Michelle Dombek
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Gina Meyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results8 ties
2022-06-12Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMichelle Beilstein / Karen Ohollaren vs Karen Dellinger / Traci Harris6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesGina Meyer / Michelle Dombek vs Julie Hansen / Rie Sasakawa6-3, 6-2
2022-06-04Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Beilstein / Karen Ohollaren vs Kristie Leake / Kristin Spear6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Townley / Michelle Dombek vs Teresa Sullivan / Sharon Kim-Geib6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDee Deggs / Gina Meyer vs Cathy Gatzke / Diane Pittmon7-5, 6-1
2022-05-21Split 11
L#1 DoublesMichelle Dombek / Kris Kelly-Koster vs Catherine Go / Shannon Bilstrom6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTrina Newcomb vs Jean Herbst1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-05-15Won 31
W#1 DoublesKaren Ohollaren / Michelle Beilstein vs Suzy Rylander / Denise Dawkins6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesTrina Newcomb vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmily McBride / Lisa Barsotti vs Annie Sumpter / Sarah Waselik6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChristina Wright / Michelle Dombek vs Julie Carmena / RENEE VANDEGRIEND6-4, 6-4
2022-05-07Won 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Ohollaren / Michelle Beilstein vs Chizuru Watanabe / Kay Dobashi6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMichelle Dombek vs Erika Finrow6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEmily McBride / Lisa Barsotti vs Lynn Moore / Robby Lafleur2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-30Split 22
L#1 DoublesMichelle Beilstein / Karen Ohollaren vs Leah Buxman / Mary Klinger6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTrina Newcomb vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmily McBride / Kris Kelly-Koster vs Sara van Beckum / Kirsten Holmes6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichelle Dombek / Gina Meyer vs Melissa Light / KEELEY PLOMBON6-0, 6-2
2022-04-23Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Dombek / Kris Kelly-Koster vs Penny Birkhofer / Cathryn Hansen6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTrina Newcomb vs Tami McAra6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMichelle Beilstein / Kathryn Eddy vs Katherine Kralj / Kari Martin6-1, 6-0
2022-04-16Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Beilstein / Karen Ohollaren vs Sherri Sacconaghi / Karen McNairy7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMichelle Dombek vs Aracelia Hettle6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesEartha Roulier / Emily McBride vs Kathleen Budnick / Joelle Lewis6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Karen Ohollaren
116W–61L career
0%88%12%
3.96
4
Emily McBride
72W–73L career
0%98%2%
3.85
4
Michelle Beilstein
99W–72L career
0%99%0%
3.78
4
Kris Kelly-Koster
79W–101L career
0%99%0%
3.78
3.5
Trina Newcomb
79W–57L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3.5
Michelle Dombek
38W–54L career
15%85%0%
3.07
0
Gina Meyer
28W–17L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.