Teams

Duval/Kane/TriLevel3.5W

2024 Duval Trilevel 18 & Over Women - Winter · 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.43 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-03-26vs Beachwalk - LynchLost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Kane / Amy Christy vs Jacquelyn Mracek / Meghan Spencer2-6, 4-6
2024-02-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Kane / Amy Christy vs Anastasia Houston / Victoria Miller4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Amy Buckley
published 4
3.44
Beth Kane
published 4
3.44
3.30
Katie Culp
published
3.24
Tammy Morreale
published
3.10
Dawn Crawford
published 3.5
3.09
Elsa Scagel
published
3.09
Amy Christy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Whitney Stefanides
published
2.98
2.97
Renee' Kirkland
published
2.95
Lauren Griffith
published
2.85
2.76
Tara Volpe
published
2.66
Caroline Welch
published 3
2.55
Adrienne Kent
published 3
2.43
Raeanne McCarty
published
1.94
Marcy Laturno
published
Lindsay Kent
published
Mary Glyn Denning
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Kane + Amy Buckley3250% games−8.9% vs expected
Tammy Morreale + Katie Culp404 matchesnot enough data
Renee' Kirkland + Beth Kane213 matchesnot enough data
Renee' Kirkland + Mary Kathleen Muldoon213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Christy + Tammy Morreale213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Buckley
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Beth Kane
15W–16L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.44
Mary Kathleen Muldoon
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Katie Culp
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.30
Tammy Morreale
24W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.24
3.5
Dawn Crawford
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.10
Elsa Scagel
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Amy Christy
33W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.09
Whitney Stefanides
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
Jessica Morgan Martens
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
Renee' Kirkland
14W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
Lauren Griffith
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Anne Marie Cushmac
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
Tara Volpe
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Caroline Welch
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Adrienne Kent
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
Raeanne McCarty
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.43
Marcy Laturno
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Lindsay Kent
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Glyn Denning
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.