Teams

Shalimar Pointe-Cerny

2022 OWB Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-27vs OWB - Shalimar Pointe-PenningtonLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Harris / Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny vs Kim Pennington / Jay Coppic1-6, 2-6
2022-04-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAndre Gustave / Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny vs Ingo Riemer / Mimi Batrony2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-04-03vs Edgewater-BachmanWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndre Gustave / Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny vs Todd Zaborski / Carlye Zaborski6-3, 6-3
2022-03-27vs Edgewater-BachmanLost 01
L#1 DoublesRadek Cerny / Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny vs Michael Johns / Iman Elkomy4-6, 1-6
2022-03-06vs OWB - Shalimar Pointe-PenningtonLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Harris / Charlotte Dunworth vs Keith Williams / Jennifer Schweikert4-6, 5-7
2022-02-27vs OWB - Shalimar Pointe-PenningtonLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Dunworth / Paul Harris vs Serena Armstrong / Kevin Dunworth4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFlavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny / Andre Gustave vs Lubomir Kaderjak / Kristie Edwards0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Gregory Bennett
published 4.5
3.47
Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.45
Paul Harris
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Melanie Schweizer
published
3.28
Charlotte Dunworth
published 3.5
Radek Cerny
published
Tina Khouri
published
William Grigsby
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gregory Bennett
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
4.00
4
Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny
60W–41L career · 5 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
Paul Harris
33W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
Melanie Schweizer
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Charlotte Dunworth
3W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Radek Cerny
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tina Khouri
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
William Grigsby
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.