Teams

In.Navarro18T

2023 Cap Tri-Level 18 & Over · 2.5-3.0-3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-13vs Ka.Warren18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesDonnarie Hales / Wurth Drummond vs McKenzie Keenan Osman / Rachel Matthews2-6, 1-6
2023-07-06vs Je.Sagal Solomon18TLost 02
L#1 DoublesDana Aderhold / Lee Anne Oxford vs Bearta Alchacar / Sharon Horton4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJanis McLaughlin / Kathryn Shields vs Beth Shelly / Michele Nowicki2-6, 3-6
2023-06-29vs Ch.Waychoff18TLost 01
L#2 DoublesLee Anne Oxford / Catherine George vs Jennifer Kaulback / Elizabeth Carroll4-6, 1-6
2023-06-22vs Je.Van Campen18TSplit 11
L#1 DoublesWurth Drummond / Donnarie Hales vs Carrie Rice / Ann Skvarcius4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesClaudia Cadet / Kathryn Shields vs Brandy Mann / Elisabeth Nixon6-2, 6-2
2023-06-15vs Ba.Wait18TSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDana Aderhold / Wurth Drummond vs Barbra Wait / Debra Phillips4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLee Anne Oxford / Leigh Stallings vs Diana Kennedy / Vickie Dagit6-1, 6-2
2023-06-13vs Na.Rodriguez18TSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLee Anne Oxford / Dana Aderhold vs Aviva Imbrey / Megan Havel6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJill Cramer / Kathryn Shields vs Erika Martin / Heather Sherwood2-6, 6-7
2023-06-08vs Ti.Dahir18TWon 20
W#1 DoublesWurth Drummond / Donnarie Hales vs Alison Kalinowski / Laura Beaver6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathryn Shields / Janis McLaughlin vs Jody Mahoney / Stephanie Poley6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5-3.0-3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Donnarie Hales
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Wurth Drummond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Lee Anne Oxford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
2.84
Dana Aderhold
published 3
2.77
Catherine George
published 3
2.76
Kathryn Shields
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Claudia Cadet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Janis McLaughlin
published
Leigh Stallings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Inma Navarro Galisteo + Lee Anne Oxford5073% games+11.1% vs expected
Donnarie Hales + Wurth Drummond111150% games+3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donnarie Hales
42W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Wurth Drummond
32W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Lee Anne Oxford
82W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.02
Inma Navarro Galisteo
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Dana Aderhold
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Catherine George
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Kathryn Shields
88W–91L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Claudia Cadet
38W–38L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Janis McLaughlin
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
Leigh Stallings
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.