Teams

Hale/18/7.5/CM/LCRC

2026 Lake Charles Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 7.5 LC (18&O) Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 2 played
Oct 18 3:30 PM
Graywood Golf & Racquet Club
2026-08-16vs Istre/18/7.5/CM/LCRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatrick Hale / Jack Vanchiere vs Carter Brinkman / Lance Thomas0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDamian Comisso / Ethan Johnson vs Drew Hoffpauir / Jeremy Istre5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarl Arabie / Andrew Kohler vs Conner Istre / Jacob Istre4-6, 1-6
2026-08-09vs Istre/18/7.5/CM/LCRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarl Arabie / Patrick Hale vs Beau Mixon / Lance Thomas2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Gover / Andy Mejia vs Carter Brinkman / Joey Brinkman2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJack Vanchiere / Ethan Johnson vs Conner Istre / Jacob Istre3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 LC (18&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Istre/18/7.5/CM/LCRC2060134
2Hale/18/7.5/CM/LCRC02061273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Andy Mejia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Carl Arabie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Damian Comisso
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Juan Molina Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Peter Gover
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Scott Ogden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Patrick Hale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Andrew Kohler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Ethan Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jack Vanchiere
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juan Molina Gonzalez + Scott Ogden404 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Kohler + Peter Gover303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andy Mejia
1W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Carl Arabie
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Damian Comisso
5W–2L career · type M · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
Juan Molina Gonzalez
19W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
Peter Gover
18W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.38
Scott Ogden
22W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.27
Patrick Hale
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
3.06
3
Andrew Kohler
13W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Ethan Johnson
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jack Vanchiere
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.