Teams

LKGA-Garrett/Blixt/Jetton RJ C

2024-2025 Racquets & Jackets Tri-Level Doubles · Women Division C (2.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-02-08vs LMRO-Romley/Jetton (Tri)Split 11
L#2 DoublesKatie Blixt / Vanessa Murray vs Meredith Romley / Julie Moore0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTracy Crouch / Erica Howard vs Lesa Conroy / Kimberly Varshine7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2025-01-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Melby / Jennifer Nogowski vs Beth Packard / Leslie Crane6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-01-13vs LNNA-Naslund/WestportWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatie Blixt / Christian Bowman vs Kerri Powell / Sandra Stinson6-2, 6-0
2025-01-04vs LMRO-Romley/Jetton (Tri)Split 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Nogowski / Lisa Levy vs Tamilla Azamova / Ann Modlin6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStephanie Vaughn / Tracy Crouch vs Lesa Conroy / Jenny Grantham3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-12-21vs LBBA-Barber/Edgemoor RJ CWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Nogowski / Jaime Cooper vs Sheila Pensler / Tiffany Varela6-2, 6-3
2024-11-23vs LNNA-Naslund/WestportSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Nogowski / Lisa Levy vs Nathalie Naslund / Astrid Peterson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTracy Crouch / Carrie Rich vs Stacie Zerfoss / Carla Deck1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women Division C (2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Jennifer Nogowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Lisa Levy
published
3.24
Laurie Watson
published 3
2.94
Erica Howard
published
2.83
Jennifer Melby
published
2.75
Kristen Nardone
published 3
2.69
Carrie Rich
published 3
2.60
Shannon Armstrong
published
2.60
Jessica Bronzert
published
2.56
Katie Blixt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Tracy Crouch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.10
Christian Bowman
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Crouch + Katie Blixt044 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Levy + Jennifer Nogowski303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennifer Nogowski
87W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Lisa Levy
18W–29L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Laurie Watson
39W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.24
Erica Howard
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Jennifer Melby
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Kristen Nardone
46W–76L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Carrie Rich
7W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Shannon Armstrong
13W–18L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Jessica Bronzert
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Katie Blixt
14W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Tracy Crouch
57W–102L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.42
2.5
Christian Bowman
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.