Teams

Baggett 6.5 40 SOAC

2022 BR Southern Combo 40 & Over - Men · 6.5 BR (40&O) Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 BR (40&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Joey Crifasi
published
3.15
Ed Anderson
published 3.5
3.09
Tom Baggett
published
3.08
John Weger
published
3.07
Richard Ward
published
3.03
Keith Schultz
published
3.03
Matt Hunt
published
2.64
Stewart Guerin
published
2.62
Brian Begue
published 3
Mark Reddinger
published
Rich Whitlow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Baggett + John Weger3448% games+0.9% vs expected
Joey Crifasi + Matt Hunt3262% games−3.6% vs expected
Richard Ward + Joey Crifasi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joey Crifasi
52W–41L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Ed Anderson
8W–21L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.15
Tom Baggett
17W–64L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
John Weger
7W–43L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
Richard Ward
16W–36L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Keith Schultz
39W–34L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
Matt Hunt
81W–63L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
Stewart Guerin
16W–28L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
2.64
3
Brian Begue
21W–35L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
2.62
Mark Reddinger
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rich Whitlow
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.