Teams

Stordahl Kickin Aces

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-06vs MacariolaWon 31
L#1 DoublesLisa Sheppard Pearson / Teresa Litfin-Wertz vs KJ Madison / Maureen Wollak3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMonica Hoffmann vs Marie Stodolka6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMallory Monge / Dina VanderWaal vs Bernadette MacKey / Rachel Johnson6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesPaula Bach vs Wendy Liu6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Dina VanderWaal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Nadezda Semenova
published
2.98
Lisa Huang
published
2.97
Paula Bach
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.95
Adena Borodkin
published 3
2.85
Monica Hoffmann
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.79
Teresa Litfin-Wertz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Lisa Sheppard Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Mallory Monge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
2.69
Karen Ring
published
2.48
Beth Hank
published 2.5
2.30
Kelly Stordahl
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Huang + Ana Paula Zamorano4352% games−1.6% vs expected
Kelly Stordahl + Nadezda Semenova224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Sheppard Pearson + Ana Paula Zamorano314 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Sheppard Pearson + Nadezda Semenova303 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Huang + Nadezda Semenova213 matchesnot enough data
Mallory Monge + Teresa Litfin-Wertz213 matchesnot enough data
Ana Paula Zamorano + Teresa Litfin-Wertz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dina VanderWaal
22W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Nadezda Semenova
19W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Lisa Huang
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.98
Paula Bach
18W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Adena Borodkin
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Monica Hoffmann
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Teresa Litfin-Wertz
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Lisa Sheppard Pearson
35W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Mallory Monge
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Ana Paula Zamorano
20W–42L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Karen Ring
17W–24L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
2.5
Beth Hank
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
Kelly Stordahl
10W–39L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.