Teams

C 6.5M CC Ganim

2023 NEOTA Combo Fall · NEOTA 6.5 Combo M Fall

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-19vs C 6.5M WR2 SharmaWon 21
W#1 DoublesEvan Kuczynski / Kevin Day vs Ashish Sharma / Himanshu Patel6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Lombardo / Paul Yu vs Bhavesh Desai / Sanket Shah3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJason Ganim / Andrew Biegacki vs Amit Jain / Sameer Shah6-0, 6-1
2023-11-12vs C 6.5M LT GarstSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrew Biegacki / Jason Ganim vs Ryan Garst / William Parry3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMateus David / Brian Razum vs Geoff Fiedler / Steven Wood6-2, 6-4
2023-10-29vs C 6.5M MV HaughtWon 10
W#2 DoublesMateus David / Brian Razum vs Yuri Borsch / Jack Gau6-1, 6-0
2023-10-22vs C 6.5M WR1 CiborekWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrew Biegacki / Jason Ganim vs Charles Ciborek / Christopher Downing6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEvan Kuczynski / Kevin Day vs Jose Muzzi / John Marshall6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMateus David / Joe Bocanegra vs Brett Daberko / Tim Shaw6-3, 6-4
2023-10-13vs C 6.5M WR2 SharmaWon 21
W#1 DoublesEvan Kuczynski / Brian Razum vs Avinash Prasad / Bhavesh Desai1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSlawomir Baldyga / Matthew Brown vs Himanshu Patel / Ashish Sharma5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMateus David / Jason Ganim vs Chetak Chakkarwar / Amit Jain6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2023-10-08vs C 6.5M LT GarstWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Biegacki / David Lombardo vs Eric Bissell / Yechun Fu6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSlawomir Baldyga / Jason Ganim vs Brian Vaught / William Parry3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMateus David / Joe Bocanegra vs Geoff Fiedler / Max Roszkowski6-4, 6-4
2023-09-23vs C 6.5M MV HaughtLost 02
L#2 DoublesMatthew Brown / Evan Kuczynski vs Hyundong Cho / Craig Nine2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMateus David / Thomas Kuttler vs Ben Cutler / Scott Limestoll3-6, 3-6
2023-09-17vs C 6.5M WR1 CiborekWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Biegacki / Jason Ganim vs Charles Ciborek / Derek Kohanski6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSlawomir Baldyga / Tim Trombetta vs David Martin / Brian Herx6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPaul Yu / Brian Razum vs Jason Seith / Tim Shaw3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · NEOTA 6.5 Combo M Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OH NEO C 6.5M Kumar8019515194
2C 6.5M CC Ganim7116819172
3C 6.5M MM1 Ghosh6215921189
4C 6.5M NC1 Booher5317717198
5C 6.5M WR2 Sharma53141023199
6C 6.5M MV Haught53131126212
7C 6.5M TP1 Bassak53131126207
8C 6.5M TP2 Fox44141024239
9C 6.5M GR Dale44101433256
10C 6.5M MM4 Viswanathan35111327205
11C 6.5M WR1 Ciborek35101430220
12C 6.5M MM3 Tyrrell2671735246
13C 6.5M NC2 Brahler2661838237
14C 6.5M CSC Jarus1781635240
15C 6.5M LT Garst0871736255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Andrew Biegacki
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.33
Evan Kuczynski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Brian Razum
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Slawomir Baldyga
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Jason Ganim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Joe Bocanegra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
David Lombardo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
David Zuber
published
Mateus David
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Paul Yu
published
Thomas Kuttler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tim Trombetta
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Ganim + Andrew Biegacki71249% games−4.7% vs expected
Jason Ganim + Evan Kuczynski2441% gamesnot enough data
Jason Ganim + Slawomir Baldyga2451% gamesnot enough data
Jason Ganim + Mateus David4253% gamesnot enough data
Evan Kuczynski + Andrew Biegacki4169% gamesnot enough data
Tim Trombetta + Brian Razum0531% gamesnot enough data
David Zuber + Tim Trombetta134 matchesnot enough data
Jason Ganim + Brian Razum033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Biegacki
33W–25L career · 5 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Evan Kuczynski
20W–15L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Brian Razum
13W–21L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Slawomir Baldyga
14W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
Jason Ganim
25W–85L career · 6 lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.02
Joe Bocanegra
19W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
David Lombardo
30W–70L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
David Zuber
7W–27L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mateus David
11W–7L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Paul Yu
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Kuttler
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Tim Trombetta
13W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.