Teams

ABroemel (Queens)

2024 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-02vs NKoesel/SChandler (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAbbey Ellis / Lauren Smith vs Tricia Shaw / Niki Koesel6-2, 6-0
2024-09-25vs KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAbbey Ellis / Jillian Hayes vs Stacey Whitney / Sarah Garner6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-09-18vs OBanchik/NO'Brien (Life Time)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKathryn Pride / Stacy Melton vs Naomi O'Brien / Anura Patel4-6, 1-6
2024-09-11vs LHuntington (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesStacy Melton / Allison Broemel vs Pam Bright / Laura Case6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-09-04vs JCarney (PPRSC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAbbey Ellis / Lauren Smith vs Annie Christie / Joan Carney6-4, 6-4
2024-08-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesAbbey Ellis / Stacy Melton vs Karen Morgan / Alliecia Butler4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-08-21vs AMinish (Lifetime)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShannon Grant / Abbey Ellis vs Lori DiFazio / Jennifer Siddall4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-08-14vs SRock/HLee (Piper Glen)Split 11
W#1 DoublesAbbey Ellis / Lauren Smith vs Emily Pease / TAMMIE BRANDT7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAllison Broemel / Stacy Melton vs Stephanie Rock / Hilary Lee2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Abbey Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Stacy Melton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Daniella James
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.96
Kathryn Pride
published
2.91
Kait Beck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.87
Allison Broemel
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Golin Kosowitz
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Broemel + Stacy Melton5750% games+4.2% vs expected
Allison Broemel + Kait Beck91446% games+4.2% vs expected
Allison Broemel + Daniella James3252% gamesnot enough data
Kait Beck + Stacy Melton134 matchesnot enough data
Allison Broemel + Kathryn Pride213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Abbey Ellis
49W–43L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Stacy Melton
15W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.19
3
Daniella James
37W–10L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
3.15
Kathryn Pride
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Kait Beck
45W–69L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Allison Broemel
67W–92L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
2.87
2.5
Golin Kosowitz
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.