Teams

Royal Payne

2024 Sarasota Combo 18 & Over Summer Weekday · 7.5 W Tuesday

6 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-09vs Laurel LoveWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristen Tooley / Jet Sagalow vs Coquina Homer / Sandra Poston6-4, 6-3
2024-07-30vs Rosedale MillerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJo Anne Cullen / Christen Tooley vs Carol Campbell / Hayley Englander6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJet Sagalow / Wendi Chapman vs Deborah Lenart-Costellone / Linda Frazier7-5, 6-2
2024-07-23vs LWN RomanoLost 02
L#1 DoublesJet Sagalow / Wendi Chapman vs Mari-Ann Kucharek / Tammy Hallam2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMelisa French / Christen Tooley vs Leslie Kornaker / Kelly Depalo7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-16vs Sarasota/Esposito/18&Over7.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesLorraine Harvey / Christen Tooley vs Christine Handel / Gina Hagopian2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesWendi Chapman / Julie Pipes vs Carol Frazier / Karen Nicholson1-6, 1-6
2024-07-09vs LWR Rain RanchersLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristen Tooley / Christine Tocco vs Cindy Davis / Angela Heck6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-02vs River Strand FranklinWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Pipes / Christen Tooley vs Hattie Grimsley / Jenny Sherr6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-25vs Payne in the Aces IIIWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Pipes / Christen Tooley vs Lisa Temple / Kim Bennaji1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-18vs LBK Public MermaidsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristen Tooley / Jet Sagalow vs Ginger Griffith-Schirmer / Deanna Rollyson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Pipes / Lorraine Harvey vs Betsy Tavernier / Jaisve van Rooy6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W Tuesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Christen Tooley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.34
Bonita Fyala
published 3.5
3.33
Wendi Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Julie Pipes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jo Anne Cullen
published
Linda Evans
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Pipes + Christen Tooley13658% games+3.8% vs expected
Christen Tooley + Wendi Chapman41147% games−7.5% vs expected
Linda Evans + Jo Anne Cullen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christen Tooley
60W–44L career · 8 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Bonita Fyala
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Wendi Chapman
37W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Julie Pipes
82W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Jo Anne Cullen
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Evans
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.