Teams

MWaleski (Jeff Adams)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Men - Thurs PM

12 players · average NTRP 4.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-05vs MGriffey (Weddington)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJustin Beverley / Grant McMasters vs Randall Miller / John Wiggs2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-21vs BChriscoe (Southampton)Won 20
W#2 DoublesRod Spence / Frank Martin vs Wesley Barnes / Scott Lucas6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJustin Beverley / Grant McMasters vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-14vs MDriscoll (Life Time)Won 10
W#2 DoublesRod Spence / Joel Turner vs Jason Yepko / Brent Michael7-5, 6-3
2022-04-07vs JClarke (Pine Lake)Won 10
W#2 DoublesRod Spence / Eric Tan vs Nils Weldy / Omar Punjabi6-1, 6-4
2022-03-24vs SHenkel (Blakeney)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRod Spence / Eric Tan vs Devesh Patel / Ryan Partridge6-2, 6-2
2022-03-10vs BSmith (Jeff Adams)Split 11
L#1 DoublesEric Tan / Rod Spence vs Felipe Bautista / John Deering2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJustin Beverley / Joel Turner vs James Smith / Avin Dwivedy6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-02-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesRod Spence / Eric Tan vs Thomas Griffin / Scott Lucas6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.62
Andy Misiaveg
published 5
4.50
Eric Tan
published 4.5
4.35
Thomas Bixler
published
4.32
Justin Beverley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.32
Rod Spence
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.29
Richard Merino
published
4.24
Michael de Amicis
published 4.5
4.23
Frank Martin
published 4.5
4.22
Timothy Shaw
published
4.21
Patrick Burns
published
4.13
Joel Turner
published
3.98
Michael Waleski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Beverley + Michael Waleski213 matchesnot enough data
Eric Tan + Rod Spence213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andy Misiaveg
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.62
4.5
Eric Tan
31W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
4.50
Thomas Bixler
16W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
4.35
4.5
Justin Beverley
86W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
4.32
4.5
Rod Spence
103W–35L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
Richard Merino
13W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Michael de Amicis
11W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Frank Martin
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
Timothy Shaw
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.22
Patrick Burns
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.21
Joel Turner
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
Michael Waleski
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.