Teams

HMTC

2021 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - NOCO · MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-22vs CSUWon 20
W#1 DoublesEric Pavilonis / Judy Stout vs Scott Sandersen / Julie Sandersen7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCimarron Spitz / Michael Robeson vs Alan Krech / Janet Krech7-6, 6-3
2021-05-19vs LVTA SILVERLost 01
L#3 DoublesJudy Stout / Jim Brownhill vs Sonda Huhta / James Elkins4-6, 6-7
2021-05-16vs LVTA BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesJim Brownhill / Vicki Dean vs Jeff Abrahamson / Heidi Abrahamson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEric Pavilonis / Judy Stout vs Jeff Fugate / Dawn Hagen0-6, 0-6
2021-04-25vs MLFSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Robeson / Cimarron Spitz vs Erin Dirvonas / Gordon Beck6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTeresa Adsit / Jim Brownhill vs Alison Earnhart / Joe Ashbee0-6, 2-6
2021-04-18vs CSULost 03
L#1 DoublesCimarron Spitz / Michael Robeson vs Scott Sandersen / Julie Sandersen6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTeresa Adsit / Eric Pavilonis vs Janet Krech / Alan Krech1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Johnson / Jim Brownhill vs Janice Sale / Dennis Tralmer0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Debbie Hansen
published 3.5
3.04
Cimarron Spitz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.91
Teresa Adsit
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Eric Pavilonis
published 3
2.52
Jim Brownhill
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.40
Judy Stout
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Michael Robeson
published
Nick Hansen
published
Vicki Dean
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Stout + Jim Brownhill0727% gamesnot enough data
Vicki Dean + Michael Robeson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debbie Hansen
51W–45L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Cimarron Spitz
50W–115L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Teresa Adsit
81W–108L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%76%23%
2.91
3
Eric Pavilonis
11W–35L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Jim Brownhill
3W–21L career · type S · 4 lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
2.52
3
Judy Stout
35W–126L career · 3 lines in 2021
78%22%<1%
2.40
Michael Robeson
28W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nick Hansen
11W–31L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Vicki Dean
3W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.