Teams

Sharkey/DV/Foothills

2024 Foothills Spring 40 & Over League · Men 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-05vs DellingerBoone/CCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 SinglesGreg Diamonti vs Justin Query1-6, 1-6
2024-04-28vs DellingerBoone/CCC/FoothillsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPhillip Bruch / Christopher Stone vs Douglas Lee Honeycutt Jr / Justin Query6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMark Bailey / Greg Diamonti vs Lawrence Thompson / Edward Rix1-6, 1-6
2024-04-07vs DellingerBoone/CCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesPhillip Bruch / Gennard Lombardozzi vs Justin Query / Mark Tumblin6-2, 6-3
2024-03-24vs DellingerBoone/CCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 SinglesPhillip Bruch vs Nathan Moehlmann6-0, 6-0
2024-03-17vs DellingerBoone/CCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesPhillip Bruch / Gennard Lombardozzi vs Mark Eckard / Phillip Early6-1, 6-3
2024-03-10vs DellingerBoone/CCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#3 DoublesGreg Diamonti / Peter Lipscomb vs Alex Boone / Kip Place2-6, 0-6
2024-03-03vs DellingerBoone/CCC/FoothillsLost 02
L#2 DoublesPhillip Bruch / Matt de Camara vs Alex Boone / Douglas Lee Honeycutt Jr3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStefan Frisch / Greg Diamonti vs Duane Mozingo / Robert Womack2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
3.67
Phillip Bruch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.41
Mitch Parry
published
3.18
Stefan Frisch
published
3.01
Donald Rex
published 3.5
2.97
Greg Diamonti
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Jayjit Roy
published
2.87
Mark Bailey
published
Jathan Sharkey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Bailey + Stefan Frisch3352% games+14.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gennard Lombardozzi
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
4.03
4
Phillip Bruch
66W–27L career · 8 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
Mitch Parry
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Stefan Frisch
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Donald Rex
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.01
3.5
Greg Diamonti
33W–54L career · 4 lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.97
Jayjit Roy
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.97
Mark Bailey
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%0%
2.87
Jathan Sharkey
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.