Teams

King/18/7.5/NOD/NOLTC

2024 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 7.5 NO (18&O) Women Day

23 players · average NTRP 3.78 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.5 NO (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Amanda Seale
published 4
3.88
Cynthia Cook
published 4
3.86
3.79
Allison Hescock
published 4
3.55
Yvonne Keegan
published
3.55
Michele Prokop
published
3.54
Ashley Gillen
published 3.5
3.49
Charlotte Meade
published 4
3.43
Gretchen Drennan
published
3.40
Dodie Powers
published
3.40
Kyle Kehoe
published
3.40
Mary Pugh
published
3.37
Marlowe Maylin
published
3.32
Madhavi King
published
3.31
Anna Breaux
published 3.5
3.30
Lauren Flower
published
Cheryl Redfearn
published 3.5
3.25
Charlotte Viener
published 3.5
3.22
Renee Labadie
published
3.22
Lisa Petagna
published
3.19
JENNIFER CAPITELLI
published
3.14
Hannah Kohlman
published
Gillian Fox
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JENNIFER CAPITELLI + Anna Breaux3262% games+4.9% vs expected
Kyle Kehoe + Renee Labadie2346% games+1.0% vs expected
Cynthia Cook + Amy Macdiarmid Browne5452% games+0.8% vs expected
Ashley Gillen + Madhavi King2449% games−2.8% vs expected
Kyle Kehoe + Hannah Kohlman3744% games−5.9% vs expected
Allison Hescock + Michele Prokop2550% games−7.8% vs expected
Lisa Petagna + Hannah Kohlman224 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Kehoe + JENNIFER CAPITELLI213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Seale
52W–27L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Cynthia Cook
26W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Amy Macdiarmid Browne
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Allison Hescock
16W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Yvonne Keegan
29W–30L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
Michele Prokop
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Ashley Gillen
18W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.54
4
Charlotte Meade
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.49
Gretchen Drennan
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.43
Dodie Powers
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
Kyle Kehoe
25W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
Mary Pugh
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Marlowe Maylin
15W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.37
Madhavi King
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Anna Breaux
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Lauren Flower
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Cheryl Redfearn
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Charlotte Viener
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Renee Labadie
28W–32L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.22
Lisa Petagna
14W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
JENNIFER CAPITELLI
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Hannah Kohlman
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Gillian Fox
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.