Teams

LA - Ace Holes

2026 One Doubles - Local League Only - LA · LA - Women 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-22vs LA - The Tough AsksLost 01
L#1 DoublesCherry Ma / Lulu Liu vs Leah Linder / Liz Millikin0-6, 1-6
2026-03-14vs LA - Development HellWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngelique Cabral / Lulu Liu vs Nicole Emanuele / Kristina Woo4-6, 6-5, 1-0
2026-03-01vs LA - Mulholland WhiteWon 10
W#1 DoublesLulu Liu / Veronica Lopez vs Sarah Carter / Flavia Kirsten6-0, 6-3
2026-02-22vs LA - Ladybugs - WhiteWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngelique Cabral / Cherry Ma vs Natalie Uribe / Ievgeniia Ostrovska6-4, 6-0
2026-02-15vs LA - Ladybugs - BlackLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Win / Lulu Liu vs Lauren Miranda / Lily Vo1-6, 2-6
2026-01-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesVeronica Lopez / Alyssa Jeong Perry vs Julia Hutchens / Alison White3-6, 3-6
2026-01-17vs LA - Slice Slice BabyLost 01
L#1 DoublesLulu Liu / Alyssa Jeong Perry vs Emily Roxworthy / Joelle Boucai0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · LA - Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LA - High Strung6262451
2LA - Ladybugs - Black6262668
3LA - The Tough Asks5353753
4LA - Slice Girls5353760
5LA - Mulholland Navy5353763
6LA - Kick Aces5353860
7LA - Slice Slice Baby4444862
8LA - The Rookies4444868
9LA - Ace Holes4444966
10LA - Development Hell35351281
11LA - Mulholland White35351289
12LA - Ladybugs - Red35351384
13LA - Ladybugs - White26261487
14LA - Baby Got Backhand17171485

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.45
Hyon A Um
published 2.5
2.42
Melissa Turai
published
2.39
Cynthia Chan
published 2.5
2.33
Jennifer Win
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.13
Angelique Cabral
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.08
Alyssa Jeong Perry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.97
Lulu Liu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.85
Cherry Ma
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hyon A Um + Jennifer Win303 matchesnot enough data
Angelique Cabral + Alyssa Jeong Perry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Hyon A Um
66W–106L career · no lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.45
Melissa Turai
16W–22L career · no lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.42
2.5
Cynthia Chan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
Jennifer Win
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Angelique Cabral
5W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Alyssa Jeong Perry
6W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Lulu Liu
3W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97
2.5
Cherry Ma
1W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.