Teams

3-Mlong40plus3.5Eno

2023 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women-Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-10vs 2-DAdams 40 -ENOLost 02
L#1 DoublesDonna Holtaway / Dawn Kleinman vs Sheron Parks / Beth Spinarski1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKim Goll / Mary T Long vs Ulrike Foley / Wendy Hanshew0-6, 1-6
2023-05-02vs 9-SEasterling-HVCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDawn Kleinman / Donna Holtaway vs Mary Susan Easterling / Ruth Caccavale6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary T Long / Kari Lovetinsky vs Rachel Cocchiaro / Caroline Carrico6-2, 6-3
2023-04-13vs 4-TBrooks40-ElmiraLost 01
L#1 DoublesDonna Holtaway / Joan St Laurent vs Terry Perrone / Kristen Fuller0-6, 6-7
2023-04-03vs 1-BBaird CHTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary T Long / Donna Holtaway vs Andy Blackburn / Stacy Brehm1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLeslie Dobkin / Kari Lovetinsky vs Melissa Fitzpatrick / Yvonne Acker0-6, 0-6
2023-03-23vs 8-JMurray-DFCWon 20
W#1 DoublesDonna Holtaway / Dawn Kleinman vs Meta Kuehn / Mehri Mckellar6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary T Long / Kim Goll vs Susan Ross / Stephanie Thomas6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-03-16vs 6-MSanchez-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesKari Lovetinsky / Mary T Long vs Cindy Bohlin / Hannah White2-6, 3-6
2023-03-07vs 5-SBrogden-Eno 40 3.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesKim Goll vs Frauke Mirenda6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLeslie Nydick / Kari Lovetinsky vs Joanne Kochuk / Bracha Blanc1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-02-28vs 7-KWhitley-EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeslie Nydick / Kim Goll vs Jannette White / Karon Mertens0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Holtaway / Mary T Long vs Suzanne Jeska / Katie Whitley4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Donna Holtaway
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.12
Dawn Kleinman
published 3
2.86
Kim Goll
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.85
Joan St Laurent
published
2.81
Kari Lovetinsky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Mary T Long
published
2.75
Maureen Green
published
2.47
Lilie Bonzani
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donna Holtaway
117W–93L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.48
3
Dawn Kleinman
18W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Kim Goll
132W–134L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%84%16%
2.86
Joan St Laurent
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Kari Lovetinsky
116W–121L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Maureen Green
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
Lilie Bonzani
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.