Teams

TCC

Adult 18 & Over Early Start League · 5.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-14vs El ConLost 12
W#1 DoublesEvan Feldhausen / Jackson Lee vs Brian Ravesloot / Marek Dubovec7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMarc Avalos vs David Fink6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNaren Shanmugavelu / Rajiv NANJUNDAREDDY vs Greg Desilva / Yao-Jan Wu3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-11-07vs El ConSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJackson Lee / Naren Shanmugavelu vs Brian Ravesloot / Greg Desilva6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesEvan Feldhausen vs Bogdan Racolta7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2021-10-31vs El ConLost 12
W#1 DoublesNaren Shanmugavelu / Evan Feldhausen vs Brian Ravesloot / Bogdan Racolta6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJorge Sepulveda vs David Fink5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRajiv NANJUNDAREDDY / Bryan Dirk vs Yao-Jan Wu / Greg Desilva5-7, 3-6
2021-10-24vs El ConLost 12
L#1 DoublesNaren Shanmugavelu / Karthik Chandrasekaran vs Marek Dubovec / Bogdan Racolta7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJorge Sepulveda vs David Fink6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMarc Avalos / Bryan Dirk vs Cody Petford / Adam Knox6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2021-10-17vs El ConLost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Perry / Marc Avalos vs Brian Ravesloot / Cody Petford6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJorge Sepulveda vs David Fink4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRajiv NANJUNDAREDDY / Bryan Dirk vs Adam Knox / Bogdan Racolta1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-10-09vs El ConSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarc Avalos / Naren Shanmugavelu vs Greg Desilva / Yao-Jan Wu6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJorge Sepulveda vs Cody Petford6-0, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.34 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Karthik Chandrasekaran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.34
Naren Shanmugavelu
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.25
Marc Avalos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Bryan Dirk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Evan Feldhausen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
John Perry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 0
Jorge Sepulveda
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Rajiv NANJUNDAREDDY
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Naren Shanmugavelu + Karthik Chandrasekaran224 matchesnot enough data
Naren Shanmugavelu + Marc Avalos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karthik Chandrasekaran
16W–12L career · 1 line in 2022
70%30%<1%
4.43
Naren Shanmugavelu
24W–14L career · 5 lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
4.34
Marc Avalos
30W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
4.25
Bryan Dirk
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Evan Feldhausen
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
0
John Perry
57W–18L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Jorge Sepulveda
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rajiv NANJUNDAREDDY
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.