Teams

Northern: Saratoga Aces

2021 40&Over Women · 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.46 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-04-24vs Mann-CliffeWon 31
L#1 DoublesNina Preston / Youngsoo Shim vs Kirsten MacTavish / Julia Reynolds3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMaura Agati vs Laura Alpert6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Hennessy / Pauline Cusick vs Paula Doherty / Ginger Leddick7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathleen Evans / Diane Lachtrupp vs Paddi McGrinder / Shazia Choudry6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-04-10vs Mann-CliffeLost 13
W#1 DoublesMay Hwang / Rachel Krackeler vs Laura Alpert / Paula Doherty6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSarita Lagalwar vs Jennifer Evans0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Brodwin / Marianne Clancy vs Jennifer Regan / Julia Reynolds3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Gershon-So / Nina Preston vs Ginger Leddick / Kirsten MacTavish5-7, 3-6
2021-03-27vs Lovin TennisWon 31
W#1 DoublesMelanie Wishart / Rachel Krackeler vs Wendi Enright / Mary Fiess Shaffer3-0
L#1 SinglesSarita Lagalwar vs Susan Perry1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Cortes / Maura Agati vs Shannon Gillson / Martha Fashouer6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRenee Brodwin / Jennifer Hennessy vs Suzannah Dormond / Samantha Swart6-2, 6-4
2021-03-21vs JetsLost 13
L#1 DoublesMelanie Wishart / Susan Cortes vs Jessica Lorusso / Kathleen Moran1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAndrea Peters vs Lisa Towle6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMarianne Clancy / Diane Lachtrupp vs Sherry Best / Kathleen Kalmer3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElaine Vukelic / Bernadette van Cott vs Randi Dessingue / Jennifer Lynch3-6, 1-6
2021-03-14vs Mann-CliffeWon 31
W#1 DoublesRachel Krackeler / Youngsoo Shim vs Jennifer Regan / Paddi McGrinder6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAndrea Peters vs Laura Alpert6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMay Hwang / Nina Preston vs Kirsten MacTavish / Ginger Leddick6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathleen Evans / Debra Gershon-So vs Michelle Mylod / Shazia Choudry1-6, 4-6
2021-02-21vs Lovin TennisWon 31
W#1 DoublesRachel Krackeler / Melanie Wishart vs Lori McCaffrey / Shannon Gillson2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAndrea Peters vs Angela Halwick6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Hennessy / Pauline Cusick vs Barbara Glasser / Cathy Lott5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSarita Lagalwar / Elaine Vukelic vs Martha Fashouer / Ni Made Utari2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-02-08vs JetsWon 31
W#1 DoublesMaura Agati / Susan Cortes vs Kathleen Moran / Cindy Denney6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAndrea Peters vs Randi Dessingue6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Hennessy / Renee Brodwin vs Sherry Best / Jane Gottlieb5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBernadette van Cott / Pauline Cusick vs Roxanne Dejohn / Kathleen Kalmer0-6, 2-6
2021-01-24vs JetsWon 31
W#1 DoublesMelanie Wishart / Susan Cortes vs GINA BRITTON / Cindy Denney6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAndrea Peters vs Randi Dessingue6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Krackeler / Youngsoo Shim vs Christine Marro / Lisa Towle6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMarianne Clancy / Diane Lachtrupp vs Kathleen Moran / Jane Gottlieb6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2021-01-17vs Lovin TennisWon 31
W#1 DoublesMelanie Wishart / Rachel Krackeler vs Barbara Glasser / Lori McCaffrey6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesAndrea Peters vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMaura Agati / Susan Cortes vs Ni Made Utari / Angela Halwick4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMay Hwang / Sarita Lagalwar vs Mary Fiess Shaffer / Samantha Swart6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Northern: Saratoga Aces09231331253
2Lovin Tennis09211534311
3Jets09191742327
4Mann-Cliffe0992758380

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Rachel Krackeler
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.77
Melanie Wishart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Andrea Peters
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.38
Jennifer Hennessy
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.36
Susan Cortes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Maura Agati
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Bernadette van Cott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
May Hwang
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Sarita Lagalwar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Marianne Clancy
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Elaine Vukelic
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.07
Nina Preston
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.92
Renee Brodwin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Debra Gershon-So
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Diane Lachtrupp
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.73
Kathleen Evans
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Pauline Cusick
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Youngsoo Shim
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

May Hwang + Diane Lachtrupp6162% games+10.4% vs expected
May Hwang + Rachel Krackeler5269% games+7.1% vs expected
May Hwang + Marianne Clancy4255% games+6.4% vs expected
Melanie Wishart + Rachel Krackeler731762% games+5.8% vs expected
Maura Agati + Jennifer Hennessy5065% games+4.1% vs expected
Pauline Cusick + Jennifer Hennessy6459% games+3.6% vs expected
Susan Cortes + Maura Agati371059% games+3.2% vs expected
Nina Preston + Debra Gershon-So3748% games+0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Krackeler
124W–44L career · 6 lines in 2021
>99%<1%<1%
4.16
4
Melanie Wishart
128W–85L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Andrea Peters
59W–37L career · 6 lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Jennifer Hennessy
76W–55L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Susan Cortes
79W–46L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Maura Agati
73W–23L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Bernadette van Cott
37W–20L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
May Hwang
55W–46L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Sarita Lagalwar
57W–54L career · 4 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Marianne Clancy
61W–72L career · 9 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Elaine Vukelic
23W–28L career · 7 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
Nina Preston
71W–77L career · 7 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.07
Renee Brodwin
60W–49L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Debra Gershon-So
56W–40L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Diane Lachtrupp
43W–35L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
2.84
Kathleen Evans
34W–38L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Pauline Cusick
74W–101L career · 6 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
Youngsoo Shim
39W–23L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.