Teams

IA/Rath/18&Over7.0X

2026 IA 18 & Over Adult Mixed League · 7.0 X'd 18 Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-01-18vs RossWon 21
W#1 DoublesDominick Rath / Erin Langdon vs Ryan Sundermann / Hillary Johnson-Jahangir6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLogan Storto / Blair Gordon vs Rolando Sanchez / Bopha Chrea6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHari Putti / JENNIFER HEBERT vs Jake Thomsen / Tracey Kramer2-6, 5-7
2025-12-14vs SteckelWon 30
W#1 DoublesDominick Rath / Erin Langdon vs Sarah Hinkhouse / Jon Hinkhouse7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Kemmerer / Jarod Smith vs Michelle Novak / Ben Barreras6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHari Putti / JENNIFER HEBERT vs Ray Krauss / Mary Milavetz6-1, 6-0
2025-11-23vs BrownWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kemmerer / Charles Errington vs Joe Link / Amy Link6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDominick Rath / Erin Langdon vs Jodi Cobb / Patrick Cosgrove6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLogan Storto / Lindy Christensen vs Suzi Carstensen / Tom Randall3-6, 2-6
2025-11-07vs GarnerWon 21
W#1 DoublesCharles Errington / Jennifer Kemmerer vs Jeffrey Garner / Rochelle Davis6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDominick Rath / Blair Gordon vs Marcus Womersley / Maleah Hampton6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJarod Smith / JENNIFER HEBERT vs Steven Odegaard / Lesley Vancura2-6, 1-6
2025-10-24vs Patten/WastaWon 20
W#1 DoublesCharles Errington / Jennifer Kemmerer vs Philip Wasta / Caren Wasta6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJENNIFER HEBERT / Dominick Rath vs Cheryl Patten / Peter Eddington6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 X'd 18 Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Rath/18&Over7.0X50123883
2Kakade/Keshwani1551328200
3Patten/Wasta0511428176

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Dominick Rath
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
3.58
Charles Errington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Jennifer Kemmerer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Hari Putti
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
JENNIFER HEBERT
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Heather Sundermann
published
3.02
Greta Rath
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Blair Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Erin Langdon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Jarod Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lindy Christensen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Logan Storto
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greta Rath + Dominick Rath3350% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Kemmerer + Charles Errington4167% gamesnot enough data
Erin Langdon + Dominick Rath303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dominick Rath
14W–13L career · 9 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.60
4
Charles Errington
7W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
Jennifer Kemmerer
60W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
Hari Putti
95W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
JENNIFER HEBERT
43W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.19
Heather Sundermann
15W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
Greta Rath
68W–62L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Blair Gordon
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Erin Langdon
31W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.88
Jarod Smith
2W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
2.80
Lindy Christensen
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Logan Storto
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.