Teams

JOlmstead (Mason Wallace)

2026 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men - Mon PM

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-21vs JMarks (PCC)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJesse Olmstead vs Chris Tomlinson3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesWilson Pegram vs Jim Marks1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJesse Olmstead vs Guilherme Dumit3-6, 4-4
W#2 SinglesAdrian Mendoza vs Andrew Schulz6-2, 2-1
2026-07-06vs TBixler (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesJesse Olmstead vs Bryan Stonestreet3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAdrian Mendoza vs Charlie Reiney2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesWilson Pegram vs Thomas Bixler0-6, 0-6
2026-06-29vs WTiedeman/KGreen (Park Road)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesAnthony Duda vs Kevin Green1-6
L#2 SinglesArjun Som Sekhar vs Jackson Tiedeman5-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesWilson Pegram vs Jason Rickel0-6, 0-6
2026-06-22vs LAyala (Hornets Nest)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesJesse Olmstead vs Pete Eakin0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAdrian Mendoza vs Paul Fackler4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesAnthony Duda vs Vaughn Schmutz3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-20Lost 03
L#1 SinglesJesse Olmstead vs Christopher Gardner6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAdrian Mendoza vs Raj Voleti2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesRahmi Eljoundi vs Jeremy Chen3-6, 0-6
2026-06-14Won 20
W#1 SinglesNick Gartner vs Randall Maddle6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAdrian Mendoza vs Bernardo Llerenas6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJesse Olmstead vs Michael Szabo6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesArjun Som Sekhar vs Guilherme Dumit3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesAdrian Mendoza vs Shivam Desai6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men - Mon PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TBixler (Queens)6218614158
2WTiedeman/KGreen (Park Road)6217718170
3LAyala (Hornets Nest)44141025186
4GDumit/ASchulz (Alexander Stree Park)35101430216
5JOlmstead (Mason Wallace)3561838255
6JMarks (PCC)1751939244

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Adrian Mendoza
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #3 Singles 17% · published 4.5
4.15
Arjun Som Sekhar
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Jesse Olmstead
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.08
Anthony Duda
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.98
Nick Gartner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.64
Wilson Pegram
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Rahmi Eljoundi
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adrian Mendoza
3W–3L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Arjun Som Sekhar
31W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
4.15
Jesse Olmstead
5W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
26%73%<1%
4.09
4.5
Anthony Duda
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
4.08
Nick Gartner
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.98
Wilson Pegram
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.64
Rahmi Eljoundi
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.