Teams

BC-MCC/RachelAlexander

2022 Adult 40 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.80 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Haruko Froeb
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Stephanie Twombley
published
Amy Karr
published 4
3.75
Renee Tinker
published
3.69
3.63
Sarah Nedelman
published
3.60
Layla Kiffin
published
3.56
Melissa Crowley
published
3.50
Kristina Mohr
published
3.30
Annie Han
published 3.5
3.28
Kari Carpino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Dianne Wellbaum
published 3.5
3.10
Rachel Alexander
published
Julie Tendoesschate
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Marci Beech
published
MaryAnn Burns
published
Mimi Fischer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Haruko Froeb
42W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
4.00
Stephanie Twombley
24W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Amy Karr
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Renee Tinker
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Elizabeth Alexander
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Sarah Nedelman
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
Layla Kiffin
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Melissa Crowley
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
3.56
Kristina Mohr
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.50
3.5
Annie Han
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Kari Carpino
41W–99L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Dianne Wellbaum
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Alexander
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Julie Tendoesschate
15W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marci Beech
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
MaryAnn Burns
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mimi Fischer
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.