Teams

Marco YMCA / Carley

2026 Collier Mixed 18 & Over Spring · Mixed 18 & over 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-23vs COLLIER/MarchandLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Carley / Joseph Kardek vs James Foley / Jocelyn Badiu1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoan Lancellot / Richard Lancellot vs Stephanie Foley / Benjamin Stevens7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBarbara Slifkin / James Ray vs Chris Marchand / Chrissy Rogers0-6, 0-6
2026-05-17vs Riverstone / BonacciLost 12
L#1 DoublesChris Brewer / Tonja Brewer vs Juraj Zeman / Natalia Zeman5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Bergman / Lisa LaSpina Bonevento vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Carley / James Ray vs David Townsley / Anita Susco0-6, 3-6
2026-05-09vs Naples Heritage / SolimineSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTonja Brewer / Chris Brewer vs Donna Curry / Dan Curry7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa LaSpina Bonevento / Jeffrey Bergman vs Cheryl Solimine / Marco Arilli3-6, 4-6
2026-05-02vs COLLIER/MarchandLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Carley / Joseph Kardek vs Monica Jimenez / John Wright0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJoan Lancellot / Richard Lancellot vs Terry Dirr / James Foley4-6, 2-6
2026-04-25vs Riverstone / BonacciLost 12
W#1 DoublesTonja Brewer / Chris Brewer vs Anita Susco / Massimo Bugliosi2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoan Lancellot / Richard Lancellot vs Vesna Petrovic / Brian Bonacci3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Saviano / Shirley Steffen vs Arlyn Amsellem / Maurice Amsellem2-6, 0-6
2026-04-18vs Naples Heritage / SolimineLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie Carley / Joseph Kardek vs Ann Garvey / Tom Cox7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoan Lancellot / Richard Lancellot vs Donna Curry / Dan Curry1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Slifkin / Richard Moll vs Rosa Thakkar / Jonathan Kaylor5-7, 5-7
2026-04-12vs Riverstone / BonacciLost 03
L#1 DoublesChris Brewer / Tonja Brewer vs Natalia Zeman / Juraj Zeman2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoan Lancellot / Richard Lancellot vs SUE BECK / Jordan Rieks4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTHOMAS PARVESSE / Shirley Steffen vs Carolyn Matje / David Townsley4-6, 4-6
2026-04-11vs COLLIER/MarchandLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoseph Kardek / Julie Carley vs Sandee Kozel / Benjamin Stevens6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoan Lancellot / Richard Lancellot vs Mary Wright / James Foley2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLisa LaSpina Bonevento / Richard Moll vs Jane Jhanji / John Wright0-6, 1-6
2026-03-28vs Naples Heritage / SolimineLost 02
L#2 DoublesDavid Keely / Shirley Steffen vs Jonathan Kaylor / Nancy Inglese1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Kardek / Julie Carley vs Bobby Marks / Rosa Thakkar2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 18 & over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Tonja Brewer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Jeffrey Saviano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Shirley Steffen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
David Keely
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.52
Joseph Kardek
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.47
Richard Lancellot
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Lisa LaSpina Bonevento
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Barbara Slifkin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
James Ray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeffrey Bergman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joan Lancellot
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Carley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Moll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
THOMAS PARVESSE
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Lancellot + Richard Lancellot11035% gamesnot enough data
Julie Carley + Joseph Kardek1836% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tonja Brewer
90W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
Jeffrey Saviano
7W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
3.5
Shirley Steffen
171W–128L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.56
3.5
David Keely
32W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
Joseph Kardek
11W–39L career · 5 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
Richard Lancellot
3W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Lisa LaSpina Bonevento
13W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Barbara Slifkin
35W–83L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
James Ray
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeffrey Bergman
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Joan Lancellot
21W–52L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julie Carley
3W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Moll
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
THOMAS PARVESSE
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.