Teams

Quail West - Cortese

2021 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-03-17vs Treviso Bay - PollockWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Kriss / Natalie Cortese vs Jacqui ONeal Privitere / Victoria Pollock6-0, 6-4
2021-03-10Won 10
W#1 SinglesNatalie Cortese vs Linda Conners3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-03-03vs Pelican Bay Park - J. BrownLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Kriss / Darina Cammarato vs Kelly Stein / Eileen Valerio3-6, 3-6
2021-02-24vs Olde Cypress - LoomisLost 01
L#1 DoublesNatalie Cortese / Mary Varilek vs Brooke Sykes / Susan Crum2-6, 1-6
2021-02-18vs COLLIER - Marco YMCA - WashakLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Kriss / Darina Cammarato vs Andrea Washak / Kelly Heintzelman5-7, 1-6
2021-01-27vs GreyHawk - L. KranitesWon 10
W#1 DoublesDarina Cammarato / Natalie Cortese vs Dina Viteretti / Jill Hulbert3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-01-24vs Heritage Bay - BeaudetWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristine Kriss / Susan Phelps vs MOLLY LANE / Tamara Blanco6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNatalie Cortese vs Heidi Hagood6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLeslie Boris / Darina Cammarato vs Andrea Kansy / Lucy Slaboch6-3, 6-2
2021-01-20vs Marco YMCA - BurschLost 02
L#1 DoublesNatalie Cortese / Candace Nanke vs Jennifer Ball / Patti Ramer5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesChristine Kriss / Susan Phelps vs Dana Bursch / Renee Facciola4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-01-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesNatalie Cortese / Susan Phelps vs Heidi Crann / Susan Ackford6-0, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Christine Kriss
published 4
3.52
Natalie Cortese
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.38
Colleen Bresson
published 3.5
3.34
Mary Varilek
published
3.34
Darina Cammarato
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Leslie Boris
published
3.10
Pam Davis
published
3.02
Leslie Prinz
published
Susan Phelps
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Kriss + Natalie Cortese6068% games+13.6% vs expected
Susan Phelps + Natalie Cortese6160% gamesnot enough data
Darina Cammarato + Natalie Cortese303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Kriss
10W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
Natalie Cortese
144W–71L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Colleen Bresson
15W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
Mary Varilek
10W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Darina Cammarato
34W–36L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
Leslie Boris
8W–3L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Pam Davis
2W–20L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.10
Leslie Prinz
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.02
Susan Phelps
119W–117L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.