Teams

NWW-Truong

2025 One Doubles · 4.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-08-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarlos Cardenas / Benjamin Bethards vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-06vs Team Pink Pony ClubWon 10
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Bethards / Felix Johnson vs Winston Liu / Nicholas Aguirre6-4, 6-4
2025-08-05vs WashedWon 10
W#1 DoublesConnor Cole / Felix Johnson vs Aaron Schechter / Ben Shapiro6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-05vs Spin CycleLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarrell Huang / Christopher Truong vs Jacob Lee / Brian McKittrick4-6, 4-6
2025-08-03vs Rock Paper BondWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarlos Cardenas / Connor Cole vs Bond Minard / Rocky Lindell6-3, 6-2
2025-08-03vs w(T__T)wWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarlos Cardenas / Connor Cole vs Tim Tao / Sam Wang6-0, 6-3
2025-07-31vs LoveAtFirstServeWon 10
W#1 DoublesConnor Cole / Benjamin Bethards vs Varun Verma / Andreas Ohrbeck6-2, 6-2
2025-07-16vs NWW-ParrishLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Pendley / Christopher Truong vs Hiromichi Yamamoto / Colin Turner1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-07-02vs Undampened VibesWon 10
W#1 DoublesConnor Cole / Felix Johnson vs Vincent Lin / Raven Thio4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-01vs NWW-NaritaLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Pendley / Christopher Truong vs Kojiro Narita / Daniel Yu2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWW-Truong7070238
2NWW-Narita6161235
3Washed5252551
4NWW-Parrish5252652
5Undampened Vibes4343749
6Spin Cycle4343868
7Cleaning3434862
8LoveAtFirstServe2323747
9CapChat1313749
10w(T__T)w1414959
11Mann 4.516161270
12Rock Paper Bond0303636
13Team Pink Pony Club0404847
14Poznick - Hogben07071484

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.31 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.56
Benjamin Bethards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
Felix Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
Carlos Cardenas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Christopher Truong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Connor Cole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Truong + Felix Johnson4159% games+4.6% vs expected
Connor Cole + Carlos Cardenas3258% games+3.6% vs expected
Carlos Cardenas + Benjamin Bethards4163% gamesnot enough data
Connor Cole + Benjamin Bethards404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Benjamin Bethards
78W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
4.56
4.5
Felix Johnson
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
4.34
4.5
Carlos Cardenas
23W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Christopher Truong
63W–47L career · 8 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Connor Cole
22W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.