Teams

5 Avalon Lancaster

2022 Richmond Mixed 40 & Over · Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-27vs 6 Burkwood ColginLost 02
L#1 DoublesMahesh Sukumaran / Daniela Otto vs Sam McKelvey / Anne Murray6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKristin Tetterton / Barry George vs Melissa Stewart / Tom Newton6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-07-20vs 4 Belmont Ballistic ArnoldLost 02
L#1 DoublesYan Wu / Daniela Otto vs Romeo Cinco / Rebecca Morgan0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBarry George / Kristin Tetterton vs James Skinner / Denise Terrell3-6, 4-6
2022-07-11vs 2 Westwood SlegowskiLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristin Tetterton / Yan Wu vs Clara Laing / Andrew Cecil3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-07-06vs 8 JRHS Captain Morgan’s SurgeLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaniela Otto / Mahesh Sukumaran vs Sung Kang / Julie Rison3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-30vs 3 ACAC Carman Double ShotsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesYan Wu / Kristin Tetterton vs Alicia Watkins / Ben Hall3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDaniela Otto / Carey Donovan vs Gail Cavallaro / Stuart Fulcher5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-05-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMatthew Cline / Daniela Otto vs Chapin Jones / Kelley Schmidt4-6, 3-6
2022-05-04vs 9 Deep Run HouffLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristin Tetterton / Mahesh Sukumaran vs Cynthia Dell / Brian Zollinhofer4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Kristin Tetterton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.77
Mahesh Sukumaran
published
3.65
Carey Donovan
published 4
3.63
Matthew Cline
published
3.61
Lara Green
published
3.56
Daniela Otto
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.40
Laura West Hatcher
published
3.34
Robert Preservati
published
3.32
Richard Bland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Teresa Lancaster
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristin Tetterton
155W–104L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Mahesh Sukumaran
16W–15L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Carey Donovan
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Matthew Cline
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Lara Green
11W–16L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Daniela Otto
117W–203L career · 5 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
Laura West Hatcher
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
3.40
Robert Preservati
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Richard Bland
251W–138L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Teresa Lancaster
7W–23L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.