Teams

Mixed Feelings Winter 26

Winter Adult 18 & Over MIXED · Adult MXD 18 & Over 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-19vs Nuts & HoneyWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrian Gordon / Jenny Stokes vs Brian Zimmerman / Michelle Coffey3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJordan Hale / Will Hale vs Loretta Nesbitt / Madhu Srinivasan6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMatt Trevena / Carolyn Lowe vs Rebekah Flannery / Caden Capper6-2, 6-2
2026-03-29vs Love Means NothingWon 21
L#1 DoublesWill Hale / Jordan Hale vs Jerome Meyer / Renae Meyer4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMatt Trevena / Jenny Stokes vs William Kennedy / Anna Winfield6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHolly Priestner / Mike Taylor vs Kristen Gilson / James McArdle6-4, 6-4
2026-03-22vs Waterloo TCLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Tully / John Tully vs Siumell Gonzalez / Michael Thome7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMatt Trevena / Amy Mitchell vs Marcie Golliher / Kevin Golliher1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBrandon Drake / Jennifer Johnson vs Brandon Joldersma / Christianne Taylor3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-03-08vs You Got ServedWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrian Gordon / Jenny Stokes vs Tim Zumwalt / Monifa Cambrelen5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Tully / John Tully vs Jon Anderson / Jodi Pruett6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Johnson / Brandon Drake vs Geo Joseph / Angie Urrea2-6, 3-6
2026-02-22vs Berry Next PointWon 21
W#1 DoublesWill Hale / Jordan Hale vs Trish Morrison / Peter Wachholz6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmy Mitchell / Matt Trevena vs Jaime Edwards / Sylette Kitchen4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Lowe / John Tully vs Jana McCown / John Fisher6-4, 7-6
2026-02-15vs Alley CatsLost 12
L#1 DoublesMargaret Lauderback / Will Hale vs Darhen Coryea / Aarushi Shukla7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMike Taylor / Holly Priestner vs Bryan Ling / Lucy Chen6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAmy Mitchell / John Tully vs Mike Nonemacher / Cale Nonemacher6-7, 5-7
2026-02-08vs Full Metal RacquetsLost 03
L#1 DoublesWill Hale / Jordan Hale vs Allisha Hall / Carey Falk3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Lowe / Brandon Drake vs Jesse Gevirtz / Tina Ho6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMargaret Lauderback / Mike Taylor vs Amanda Sullivan / Kevin Polk4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Adult MXD 18 & Over 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mixed Feelings Winter 2643101125198

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Amy Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.01
Jenny Stokes
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.90
Carolyn Lowe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Lisa Tully
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Will Hale
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.81
Brian Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Holly Priestner
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.75
Brandon Drake
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Margaret Lauderback
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Jordan Hale
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Matt Trevena
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Mike Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
John Tully
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Will Hale + Jordan Hale14755% games+11.8% vs expected
Amy Mitchell + Matt Trevena2445% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Lowe + Matt Trevena4254% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Lauderback + Matt Trevena224 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Lauderback + Will Hale213 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Lowe + Brandon Drake123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Mitchell
10W–14L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.21
Jenny Stokes
60W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Carolyn Lowe
49W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Lisa Tully
25W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Will Hale
52W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Brian Gordon
17W–13L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Holly Priestner
39W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Brandon Drake
2W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Margaret Lauderback
50W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.72
Jordan Hale
25W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Matt Trevena
25W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Mike Taylor
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.70
John Tully
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.