Teams

ACAC/Glenmore Acers

2025 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-08vs Farmington-CravenLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathleen Edwards / Danielle Coccomo vs Sherry Nedzbala / Caroline Childers7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWendi Cook / Lisa Christianson vs Gina Hogue / Courtney Sievers1-6, 1-6
2025-05-28vs Farmington-CravenLost 01
L#1 DoublesDanielle Coccomo / Ann Hague vs Rachael Craven / Caroline Childers4-6, 1-6
2025-05-18vs BHSC-GrossmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesWendi Cook / Kathleen Kariel vs Jennifer Farmer / Diana Whitten3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCandice van der Linde vs Sara Wist2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Coccomo / Apitchaya Miller vs Monica Prichard / Sherry Lake6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-27vs BHSC-GrossmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesDanielle Coccomo / Stephanie Bolton vs Monica Prichard / Josefina Bande2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCandice van der Linde vs Sherry Lake6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWendi Cook / Charlotte Odom vs Diana Whitten / Jennifer Farmer1-6, 0-6
2025-04-13vs Farmington-CravenLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathleen Kariel / Lisa Christianson vs Rachael Craven / Susan Brooks6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesApitchaya Miller vs Sherry Nedzbala0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWendi Cook / Charlotte Odom vs Lauren Holzman / Jeanette Wang2-6, 3-6
2025-04-10vs BHSC-GrossmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesDanielle Coccomo / Kathleen Kariel vs Melissa Grossman / Josefina Bande7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCandice van der Linde vs Diana Whitten7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWendi Cook / Apitchaya Miller vs Monica Prichard / Patricia Clifford0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.48
Candice van der Linde
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Danielle Coccomo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.20
Apitchaya Miller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.12
Lisa Christianson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.12
Ann Hague
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.11
Wendi Cook
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.06
Kathleen Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.84
Charlotte Odom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Kathleen Kariel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Bolton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlotte Odom + Wendi Cook044 matchesnot enough data
Wendi Cook + Lisa Christianson134 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Coccomo + Apitchaya Miller123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Candice van der Linde
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
2.5
Danielle Coccomo
6W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Apitchaya Miller
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Lisa Christianson
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Ann Hague
27W–66L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Wendi Cook
7W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Kathleen Edwards
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Charlotte Odom
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.84
Kathleen Kariel
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Bolton
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.