Teams

J.Lake 55+

2023 Cap Adult 55 & Over · 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Fanelly / Andrea McCartney vs Brenda Coules / Martha Zurawel6-3, 6-1
2023-05-04vs I.Gesher 55Won 20
W#2 DoublesSusan Fanelly / Jennifer Bricker vs Mollie Hodl / Isabelle Homes Gesher4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndrea McCartney / Susan Shaw vs Chandler Bastian / Wendy Burkard6-0, 6-0
2023-04-26vs K.MCKEE 55+Won 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bricker / Susan Fanelly vs Suellen Bailey / Laura Holt-Kabel3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiane Werner / Andrea McCartney vs Juli Korsnack / Annette Page7-6, 6-1
2023-04-21vs S.Greer/TaltonWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Fanelly / Diane Werner vs Barbara Kelley / Susan Cook7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAndrea McCartney / Susan Shaw vs Kimberley Matthews / Sharon Foster6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJudy Tarlton / Leslie Corn vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-31vs S.RABBYWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Fanelly / Andrea McCartney vs Deb Skiko / Dana Weiland6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Bricker / Susan Flanagan vs Chris Buscher / Ginger Sidoti6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLeslie Corn / Sherry Ingle vs Stephanie Rabby / Jennifer Boyd2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-24vs M.Van Lokeren 55+Won 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Fanelly / Andrea McCartney vs Beth Johnson / Noelle Karlawish6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDonna Wells / Susan Hembarsky vs Marybeth Margolis / Missy van Lokeren6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Flanagan / Jennifer Bricker vs Tara LeFevre / Sarah Bell6-0, 6-2
2023-03-22vs S.Greer/TaltonWon 20
W#2 DoublesAndrea McCartney / Susan Fanelly vs Lisa Talton / Susan Doninger Greer6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Bricker / Susan Flanagan vs Rebecca Procter / Kimberley Matthews6-4, 6-3
2023-03-17vs I.Gesher 55Won 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Fanelly / Diane Werner vs Mollie Hodl / Cynthia Smith0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Bricker / Susan Flanagan vs Deanna Drescher / Wendy Burkard6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Susan Fanelly
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Jennifer Bricker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Andrea McCartney
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.52
Tracey Carlin
published 4
3.27
Sherry Ingle
published
3.26
Donna Wells
published
3.18
Susan Hembarsky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Leslie Corn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Joyce Lake
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracey Carlin + Jennifer Bricker13556% games+7.6% vs expected
Leslie Corn + Susan Hembarsky121151% games−2.1% vs expected
Susan Fanelly + Jennifer Bricker6354% gamesnot enough data
Tracey Carlin + Susan Hembarsky7172% gamesnot enough data
Susan Fanelly + Andrea McCartney6160% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Corn + Andrea McCartney314 matchesnot enough data
Sherry Ingle + Susan Hembarsky224 matchesnot enough data
Andrea McCartney + Tracey Carlin224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Susan Fanelly
265W–92L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.85
4
Jennifer Bricker
238W–222L career · 6 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Andrea McCartney
146W–106L career · 7 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Tracey Carlin
154W–108L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
Sherry Ingle
15W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Donna Wells
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
3.26
3.5
Susan Hembarsky
101W–133L career · 1 line in 2023
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Leslie Corn
93W–72L career · 2 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.05
Joyce Lake
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.