Teams

Sonterra Select

2025 55 & OVER Mixed Doubles · 7.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-14vs Aged to PerfectionWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Fitzpatrick / Susan Loyola vs Jason Nydegger / Sara Folmar6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlejandro Quetzeri / Deborah Lange vs Matthew Muddiman / Gina Jones6-4, 6-3
2025-09-14vs Aged to PerfectionWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Fitzpatrick / Susan Loyola vs Jason Nydegger / Sara Folmar6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShawn Connolly / Teri Quance vs Michael Saylor / Karen Gauthier6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesBenjamin Lopez / Michelle Gonzalez vs Nando Gonzalez / Gina Jones2-2
2025-08-17vs Aged to PerfectionWon 30
W#1 DoublesTodd Spears / Elsa Ang vs Nando Gonzalez / Karen Gauthier6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlejandro Quetzeri / Susan Loyola vs Matthew Muddiman / Dianne Moe6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Seale / Sue Baillio vs Michael Saylor / Gina Jones6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Todd Spears
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.84
Steve Surbaugh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Daniel Seale
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Jason Garriott
published
3.74
Alejandro Quetzeri
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Benjamin Lopez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.45
Mike Wilkinson
published
3.45
Shawn Connolly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Jane Spears
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Susan Loyola
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Teri Quance
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Rose Stawick
published
3.08
Sue Baillio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Evelyn Wilkinson
published
2.96
Deborah Lange
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Michelle Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Elsa Ang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Fitzpatrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Gonzalez + Todd Spears7069% games+23.0% vs expected
Todd Spears + Jane Spears134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Todd Spears
47W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Steve Surbaugh
32W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Daniel Seale
12W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
Jason Garriott
16W–20L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Alejandro Quetzeri
18W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Benjamin Lopez
19W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Mike Wilkinson
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Shawn Connolly
12W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Jane Spears
26W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Susan Loyola
19W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.30
Teri Quance
19W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Rose Stawick
31W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
Sue Baillio
38W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Evelyn Wilkinson
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Deborah Lange
28W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Michelle Gonzalez
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Elsa Ang
8W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Fitzpatrick
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.