Teams

GJTC DFIFE

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - WS · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - WS

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-16vs GJTC JWENDTWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Fife / Richard Plett vs Mathew Dokoupil / Alan MacH7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHoward Abee / Craig Smith vs Blake Bickham / Thad Scholl6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-09vs GJTC KKILLIANWon 20
W#1 SinglesRichard Plett vs Jimmy Hillan6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHoward Abee / Craig Smith vs Seth Ritchey / Matt Delao6-1, 6-4
2024-06-26vs GJTC JRHOADSWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Fife / Richard Plett vs Stuart Roath / Stephen Kurtenbach6-2, 6-1
2024-06-18vs GJTC JWENDTWon 20
W#1 DoublesCraig Smith / Howard Abee vs Ryan Scotting / Keith Decker6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRichard Plett / John Hanna vs Mathew Dokoupil / Alan MacH7-6, 6-2
2024-06-11vs GJTC KKILLIANWon 10
W#2 DoublesHoward Abee / Dan Johnson vs Curt Hansen / Seth Ritchey6-4, 7-5
2024-06-04vs GJTC JRHOADSWon 20
W#1 DoublesRichard Plett / Craig Smith vs Benjamin Blair / Stephen Kurtenbach6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHoward Abee / Stuart Hall vs John Rhoads / Mark Nickel6-1, 6-0
2024-05-28vs GJTC JWENDTLost 02
L#2 DoublesRichard Plett / Scott Powell vs Richard Arata / Steve Brown4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCraig Smith / Howard Abee vs Mathew Dokoupil / Alan MacH7-5, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Stuart Hall
published
3.50
David Fife
published 4
3.48
Richard Plett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
John Hanna
published
3.21
3.19
Howard Abee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Scott Powell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Hanna + Stuart Hall9259% games+3.4% vs expected
Howard Abee + Richard Plett4165% gamesnot enough data
Howard Abee + Stuart Hall123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stuart Hall
32W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.55
4
David Fife
31W–18L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Richard Plett
161W–68L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.48
John Hanna
37W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
Srinivasa Rao Pinnamaneni
16W–16L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Howard Abee
39W–41L career · 6 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Scott Powell
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.