Teams

WNCD Kroondyk (ARC Crowne)

Singles League 18 & Over NC WNC 2025 · 18+ Men 3.5 - Thursday PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-04vs WNCD West (HRC)Won 21
W#1 SinglesDave Kroondyk vs Daniel Walker6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMark Beno vs Chris Westmoreland6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMatt Roland vs Aaron Green6-0, 6-0
2025-08-28vs WNCC Dixon (ARC-S)Split 11
L#1 SinglesWinfield Brians vs Javier Zambrano4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMark Beno vs Carl Michael Uy6-4, 6-4
2025-08-14vs WNCF Mabunga (ARC-S)Won 21
W#1 SinglesDave Kroondyk vs William Krueger6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMark Beno vs Breen OBrien0-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMatt Roland vs Drew Dawson6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2025-08-07vs WNCC Nelson (CCA)Won 21
W#1 SinglesDave Kroondyk vs Zachary Flaming4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesWinfield Brians vs Brennan Trantham7-5, 6-1
L#3 SinglesMark Beno vs Craig Nelson1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-07-31vs WNCC Dixon (ARC-S)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesDave Kroondyk vs Chris Dixon6-4, 6-0
L#2 SinglesMark Beno vs Dennis Mason4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMatt Roland vs Carl Michael Uy4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-07-10vs WNCF Mabunga (ARC-S)Won 21
W#1 SinglesDave Kroondyk vs William Krueger6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMatt Roland vs Drew Dawson6-0, 6-3
L#3 SinglesMichael Gilpin vs Chris Albers3-6, 0-6
2025-07-03vs WNCD West (HRC)Won 21
L#1 SinglesMark Beno vs Daniel Walker6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDave Kroondyk vs Chris Westmoreland6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJordan Stiles vs Samuel Henderson6-2, 7-6
2025-06-26vs WNCC Nelson (CCA)Split 11
L#1 SinglesMatt Roland vs Thomas Peaden2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJordan Stiles vs Daniel Berchenko6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Men 3.5 - Thursday PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Dave Kroondyk
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.40
Jordan Stiles
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.33
Winfield Brians
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.10
Matt Roland
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.74
Michael Gilpin
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Mark Beno
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Kroondyk + Matt Roland213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dave Kroondyk
96W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.73
Jordan Stiles
23W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
Winfield Brians
19W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Matt Roland
30W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.10
Michael Gilpin
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Mark Beno
4W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.