Teams

LA - Slice Girls

2023 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-11-19vs LA - Team FEDALLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarguerite Harrop / Emily Wissink vs Jenny Isaacson / Julie Flygare1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-11-05vs LA - Queen Anne 3.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Durbin / Rina Matsuoka vs Charlotte Gray / Diana Chow1-6, 2-6
2023-10-29vs LA - Wise AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesRina Matsuoka / Veronika Zherdeva vs Justine Lassoff / Lauren Giordano6-0, 6-1
2023-10-08vs LA - Shadow's AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarguerite Harrop / Julie Warshaw vs Sarah Downie / Michelle Crossman2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-10-07vs LA - MountainGate GatorsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarguerite Harrop / Victoria House vs Rebecca Mall / Jennifer Toplitzky1-6, 3-6
2023-10-01vs LA - Kiss My AceLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Wissink / Marguerite Harrop vs Mallika Arora / Stephanie Salomon1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRina Matsuoka / Julie Kalechstein vs Reanne Charuhas / Dena Siegel3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-09-24vs LA - Victorious SecretWon 10
W#1 DoublesRina Matsuoka / Veronika Zherdeva vs Alexis Cittadine / Stephanie Kearnaghan6-4, 6-4
2023-09-17vs LA-LLW-LATC-Lara FermanisLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Wissink / Marguerite Harrop vs Dana Reinisch / Deidra Hoye4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRina Matsuoka / Julie Warshaw vs Vicki Carrington / Devin O'Fallon1-6, 5-7
2023-09-10vs LA - Downtown AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesVeronika Zherdeva / Rina Matsuoka vs Diana Rochford / Marion Bright6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Marguerite Harrop
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Julie Warshaw
published
3.38
Veronika Zherdeva
published
3.29
Rina Matsuoka
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Alisha Kohli
published 3.5
3.27
Kinsey Ball
published
3.05
Andrea Kinloch
published 3.5
2.67
Delta Wright
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rina Matsuoka + Marguerite Harrop2346% gamesnot enough data
Kinsey Ball + Rina Matsuoka123 matchesnot enough data
Veronika Zherdeva + Rina Matsuoka213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Marguerite Harrop
45W–25L career · 5 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.64
Julie Warshaw
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
Veronika Zherdeva
23W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Rina Matsuoka
44W–47L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Alisha Kohli
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.27
Kinsey Ball
23W–24L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Andrea Kinloch
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.05
3
Delta Wright
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.