Teams

Ossman/Nashville

2025 Combo 55 & Over - Nashville · 7.5 Women - Saturday AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.88 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.5 Women - Saturday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Kathleen Carbonari
published
3.82
Cindy Mccullough
published 4
3.81
Becky Husi
published 4
Brenda Ossman
published 4
3.74
Janet Adamson
published
3.73
Rhonda Petrin
published
3.65
Melissa Geno
published
3.50
Donna Demouy
published
3.45
Sandra Elliott
published
3.38
Thalia Kahl
published
3.36
Jacqueline King
published
3.33
Susan Manley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Cheryl Byrd
published 3.5
3.20
Marsha Simoneaux
published
2.89
Nancy Preston
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Mccullough + Kathleen Carbonari19364% games+5.4% vs expected
Marsha Simoneaux + Cheryl Byrd3445% games−7.2% vs expected
Rhonda Petrin + Donna Demouy2350% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Mccullough + Rhonda Petrin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Carbonari
54W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
4.06
4
Cindy Mccullough
39W–31L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Becky Husi
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Brenda Ossman
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Adamson
28W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Rhonda Petrin
20W–19L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Melissa Geno
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Donna Demouy
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Sandra Elliott
5W–25L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Thalia Kahl
22W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Jacqueline King
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Susan Manley
26W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Cheryl Byrd
22W–10L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Marsha Simoneaux
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
Nancy Preston
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.