Teams

Murray/Williams 3.0 Dbls Wed

2023 Piedmont Summer Daze Doubles · Women 3.0 Wed PM Doubles

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2023-06-28vs Jackson 3.0 Dbls 18+ WedWon 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Williams / Blythe Murphy vs Linda Shuster / Suzi Jackson6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 Wed PM Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Blythe Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Andrea Hayes
published 3
2.87
Jennifer Phelps
published
2.80
Sharon Williams
published
Ashley Raper
published 3
2.64
Deborah Ysidron
published 3
2.44
Leslie Patterson
published
Leslie Murray
published
Noelle Budzyn
published
Spring Walsh
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Blythe Murphy
127W–108L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.36
3
Andrea Hayes
19W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
Jennifer Phelps
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
2.87
Sharon Williams
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Ashley Raper
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Deborah Ysidron
16W–26L career · type A · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
2.64
Leslie Patterson
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
0%67%33%
2.44
Leslie Murray
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Noelle Budzyn
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Spring Walsh
7W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.