Teams

Rockledge - Tulloch

2025 Brevard Trilevel · 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesRicardo Cortez / Juan Lebron vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-04vs EFSC - ZavaletaWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Lamb / Ricardo Cortez vs Isidro Zavaleta / William Honaker3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-21vs RCCB - UdvardyWon 20
W#2 DoublesRyan Colon / David Tran vs Rich HOGARTH / Pete Tattersall6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJim Tulloch / Mike Casey vs Richard Martin / Craig Tretheway6-2, 6-3
2025-07-19vs EFSC - ZavaletaLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnthony Kalman / Ricardo Cortez vs Kyle McIntosh / Joshua Bergren6-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesRicardo Cortez / Juan Lebron vs Nathan Hartnett / Nick DeFile3-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesScott Lamb / Anthony Kalman vs Nathan Hartnett / David Castillo1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCallum Tulloch / David Tran vs Cameron Hartnett / Krishna Addagarla0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMike Casey / Michael Stefik vs Todd Christie / Grant Wells4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Juan Lebron
published
3.52
Ricardo Cortez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Anthony Kalman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.26
Ryan Colon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Mike Casey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Callum Tulloch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Mathew Deater
published
3.04
Michael Stefik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Jim Tulloch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Colon + Juan Lebron4252% gamesnot enough data
Callum Tulloch + Mathew Deater123 matchesnot enough data
Juan Lebron + Mike Casey033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Juan Lebron
13W–19L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
Ricardo Cortez
24W–71L career · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Anthony Kalman
5W–14L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.44
Ryan Colon
26W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Mike Casey
19W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
3.5
Callum Tulloch
17W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Mathew Deater
23W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Michael Stefik
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Jim Tulloch
14W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.