Teams

CP YELLOW

2025 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-06-12vs LTC-D NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesLena Ursten Hobbs / Elizabeth Walker vs Christie Bibeau / Ellen Muller6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDeborah Clark / AMY SITZE vs Leslie Hauschildt / Elizabeth Shields2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeborah Howard / Robyn Frahm vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-11vs DTC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Wellham / Lena Ursten Hobbs vs Kimi Davis / Meredith Munro2-6, 4-6
2025-06-05vs MVCC GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesLena Ursten Hobbs / Elizabeth Walker vs Carolyn Wachuta / Kristen Hoffman6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Clark / Susan Pesso vs Beth Eiseman / Linda McFarlin6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobyn Frahm / Deborah Howard vs Linda Lea / Patti Hartman6-2, 6-2
2025-06-04vs GTC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesLena Ursten Hobbs / Kathleen McKern vs Suzette Emerson / Lisa Winston2-6, 1-6
2025-05-29vs MC REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesDeborah Clark / Barbara Nevins vs Kirsten Sharer / Kathleen Connell6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCyndie Miller / Amy Crockett vs Becky Lowery / Joy EVANS5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDana Breitenstein / Deborah Howard vs Paige Doherty / Lorrie Johnson6-2, 6-1
2025-05-22vs MC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeborah Clark / Susan Pesso vs Sharlene Funk / Kat Holm6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAMY SITZE / Cyndie Miller vs Amy Hank / Jillian Clark7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Crockett / Dana Breitenstein vs Frances Swartwout / Kim Hagar6-1, 6-0
2025-05-20vs DTC BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesLena Ursten Hobbs / Elizabeth Walker vs Pamela Marsh / Dana Pianowski6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCyndie Miller / AMY SITZE vs Cherlyn Linden / Lynn Tartell6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBarbara Nevins / Amy Crockett vs Sarah Sexton / Kimberly Nanke1-6, 4-6
2025-05-18vs GTC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesLena Ursten Hobbs / Susan Pesso vs Susan Rosenthal / Ginny Crise6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCyndie Miller / AMY SITZE vs Karen Schuster / Karen Ryan7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBarbara Nevins / Robyn Frahm vs Bevin Wallace / Peggy Moody6-3, 6-4
2025-05-15vs LTC-D GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Pesso / Elizabeth Walker vs Lori Penney / Jo Johnson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBarbara Nevins / Robyn Frahm vs Teri Harrington / Jill McKeon7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAMY SITZE / Amy Crockett vs Tia Heneghan / Liz Hafer7-6, 6-3
2025-05-14vs DTC YELLOWWon 10
W#2 DoublesLena Ursten Hobbs / Kathleen McKern vs Linda Feiman / Susan Nakano6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-30vs GTC BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesLena Ursten Hobbs / Christina Wellham vs Sue Hickey / Sanda McMillan4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Dana Breitenstein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Lena Ursten Hobbs
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Deborah Howard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Susan Pesso
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Amy Crockett
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Barbara Nevins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Cyndie Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
AMY SITZE
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.70
Robyn Frahm
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Julie Schindler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cyndie Miller + AMY SITZE18361% games+0.1% vs expected
Robyn Frahm + AMY SITZE1539% games−9.8% vs expected
Robyn Frahm + Lena Ursten Hobbs4160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dana Breitenstein
26W–14L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Lena Ursten Hobbs
179W–121L career · type A · 8 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3
Deborah Howard
16W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Susan Pesso
12W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Amy Crockett
13W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Barbara Nevins
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Cyndie Miller
21W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
AMY SITZE
27W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Robyn Frahm
83W–65L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Julie Schindler
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.