Teams

WI Tri Delta W Summer Sngls MALT Heathcote

2023 WI Other · WI Tri Level Delta Summer Singles Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-27Won 20
W#1 SinglesIdana Tang vs Gwen Finnegan7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJill Heathcote vs Christina Schmoker6-4, 6-2
2023-07-20Lost 02
L#1 SinglesIdana Tang vs Jackie Batty2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJill Heathcote vs Audrey Marchesini6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-07-20Lost 01
L#2 SinglesIdana Tang vs Lauren Lindley6-7, 1-6
2023-07-19Lost 01
L#3 SinglesJill Heathcote vs Jennifer Thorne4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesIdana Tang vs Shaina Gordon3-6, 1-6
2023-06-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesJill Heathcote vs Hannah Gundersen7-5, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJill Heathcote vs Erin Fouch4-6, 2-6
2023-05-07Won 10
W#2 SinglesIdana Tang vs Holly Wegner0-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · WI Tri Level Delta Summer Singles Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Tri Delta W Summer Sngls MALT Wegner82201023202
2WI Tri Delta W Summer Sngls MALT Mavlyutov82201024227
3WI Tri Delta W Summer Sngls MALT Madson64201021187
4WI Tri Delta W Summer Sngls MALT Finnegan37102042278
5WI Tri Delta W Summer Sngls MALT Bishop37102044304
6WI Tri Delta W Summer Sngls MALT Heathcote28102042302

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Esra Alagoz
usually #2 Singles 62%, also #1 Singles 23% · published 4
3.59
Nadia Gonzalez
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
3.23
Shayna Mace
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.97
Jill Heathcote
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Heather Drought
usually #3 Singles 73%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3
Idana Tang
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Esra Alagoz
82W–35L career · 13 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.94
Nadia Gonzalez
15W–19L career · 5 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
Shayna Mace
24W–40L career · 9 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Jill Heathcote
52W–43L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Heather Drought
43W–69L career · 11 lines in 2023
not enough data
Idana Tang
7W–21L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.