Teams

RH - Sanocki

2025 · 2026 SATA USTA MXD 40 & Over - Fall

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings4 teams · 2026 SATA USTA MXD 40 & Over - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SATA/Butch Durrence8118924241
2BP - Kowalewski45141329239
3RH - Sanocki45121537263
4SCC - Frischer/Avendano27101739267

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Donald King
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
3.40
Molli Sanocki
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.38
Megan Stern
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.35
Sharon Baker
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.32
Norberto Donnet
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Dave Dittmer
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.28
Mike Correal
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Michelle Munroe
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published
3.10
Laura Beth King
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published
3.06
Ronnie Sattele
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Sara Donnet
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
2.94
Jason Sanocki
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Gregg Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Stern + Laura Beth King4161% games+6.5% vs expected
Megan Stern + Michelle Munroe2640% games−10.1% vs expected
Molli Sanocki + Michelle Munroe404 matchesnot enough data
Jason Sanocki + Norberto Donnet404 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Baker + Michelle Munroe314 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Baker + Dave Dittmer314 matchesnot enough data
Donald King + Norberto Donnet314 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Baker + Norberto Donnet033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Donald King
17W–17L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Molli Sanocki
23W–18L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Megan Stern
44W–45L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
Sharon Baker
14W–8L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Norberto Donnet
23W–18L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Dave Dittmer
22W–25L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Mike Correal
6W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Michelle Munroe
34W–31L career · 17 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.14
Laura Beth King
13W–24L career · 14 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Ronnie Sattele
4W–20L career · 9 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
Sara Donnet
40W–14L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
Jason Sanocki
16W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Gregg Johnson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.