Teams

Wilbert/18/2.5/M/BREC

2026 BR Adult 18 & Over - Men · 2.5 BR (18&O) Men

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-04-27vs Chenevert/18/2.5/M/BRECWon 21
W#1 DoublesBeau Comeaux / Samuel Wagner vs Hayden Ellis / Jude Chenevert6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesBlake Fair vs Pranjal Mishra0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCaden Eisen / Jon David Koch vs Felix Burch / Connor Smith6-2, 6-2
2026-04-20vs Dornier/18/2.5/M/LegWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeau Comeaux / Esten Fuselier vs Chris Patureau / MIKE ODEAY4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCaden Eisen / Jon David Koch vs Sean Freeman / Bret Moore6-4, 6-0
2026-04-13vs Blalock/18/2.5/M/SOACLost 12
L#1 DoublesEsten Fuselier / Caden Eisen vs Collin Guidry / Joseph Hall1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJoseph Mengis vs Luke Blalock6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSamuel Wagner / Tyler Waddick vs Derek Bordelon / Saleh Babazadeh2-6, 1-6
2026-03-30vs Caruso/18/2.5/M/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeau Comeaux / Esten Fuselier vs Preston Caruso / James Hammatt1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJon David Koch vs Keegan Stansberry0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSamuel Wagner / Caden Eisen vs Ronnie Rockforte / Tyler Wilson3-6, 5-7
2026-03-23vs Breaux/18/2.5/M/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesCaden Eisen / Samuel Wagner vs Brandon Terrance / Davante Thomas4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEsten Fuselier vs William Kim0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBlake Fair / Joseph Mengis vs Isaiah Breaux / Adam Knapp1-6, 3-6
2026-03-09vs Dornier/18/2.5/M/LegWon 21
L#1 DoublesJon David Koch / Tyler Waddick vs MIKE ODEAY / Chris Patureau0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJoseph Mengis vs Bret Moore6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBeau Comeaux / Caden Eisen vs Chuck Quartararo / Sam Cottano6-0, 7-5
2026-03-02vs Chenevert/18/2.5/M/BRECWon 30
W#1 DoublesJon David Koch / Tyler Waddick vs Hayden Ellis / Russ Ladnier5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJoseph Mengis vs Jonah Thomas6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBeau Comeaux / Esten Fuselier vs Felix Burch / Jude Chenevert6-0, 6-1
2026-02-23vs Blalock/18/2.5/M/SOACLost 12
L#1 DoublesBlake Fair / Jon David Koch vs Collin Guidry / Joseph Hall0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesEsten Fuselier vs Derek Bordelon1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Bourgeois / Joseph Mengis vs Saleh Babazadeh / MITCHELL FABACHER6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-16vs Caruso/18/2.5/M/BRECLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeau Comeaux / John Bourgeois vs Roland Perault / Tyler Wilson5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJoseph Mengis vs Preston Caruso6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTyler Waddick / Samuel Wagner vs Ronnie Rockforte / Wade Guitreau2-6, 2-6
2026-02-09vs Breaux/18/2.5/M/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesCaden Eisen / Blake Fair vs Isaiah Breaux / Jordan Nauck0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBeau Comeaux vs William Kim2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSamuel Wagner / Jon David Koch vs Adam Knapp / Josh Yankowsky0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 BR (18&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Lyndon Wilbert
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.59
Joseph Mengis
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Beau Comeaux
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.29
Esten Fuselier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.20
Blake Fair
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.17
Caden Eisen
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.10
Samuel Wagner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.08
Jon David Koch
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
1.99
Tyler Waddick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
John Bourgeois
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Esten Fuselier + Beau Comeaux213 matchesnot enough data
Beau Comeaux + Joseph Mengis303 matchesnot enough data
Samuel Wagner + Caden Eisen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lyndon Wilbert
32W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Joseph Mengis
10W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%26%74%
2.59
2.5
Beau Comeaux
18W–4L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
Esten Fuselier
3W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
Blake Fair
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
2.5
Caden Eisen
6W–10L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Samuel Wagner
3W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Jon David Koch
5W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Tyler Waddick
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
John Bourgeois
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.