Teams

MLLBA-Bartolucci / River Run

2025 Lake 40 & Over USTA Mixed Doubles · Mixed 3.0 Thurs PM 40+

10 players · average NTRP 2.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-10vs MLTPO-Powell/Westport_40 Mixed3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Ridgway / Jonathan Ridgway vs Jason Schoenrock / Hanna Schoenrock6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHolly Ridgway / Jonathan Ridgway vs Kenny Rhyne / Jenna Hunt6-1, 6-1
2025-07-24vs MLKGI-Gibson/WestportLost 01
L#2 DoublesHolly Ridgway / Jonathan Ridgway vs KJ Gibson / Bae Simalayvong3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-07-17vs MLKMA-Martin/Jetton MX 40 3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Bartolucci / Casey Bartolucci vs Dawn Roniger / Steve Riddle3-6, 3-6
2025-07-10vs MLTPO-Powell/Westport_40 Mixed3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Bartolucci / Casey Bartolucci vs Melissa Whipple / James Laurenson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHolly Ridgway / Jonathan Ridgway vs Jodi Vose / Matt van Nortwick6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Bartolucci / Casey Bartolucci vs Karen Smith / Bryan Pruitt6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 3.0 Thurs PM 40+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Lisa Bartolucci
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.18
Casey Bartolucci
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.10
Jonathan Ridgway
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Lauren Verlander
published
2.69
Andrea Venus
published 3
2.67
Holly Ridgway
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.22
Chris Clunie
published 2.5
Edgar Brewer
published
Lauren Clunie
published
Marty Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Ridgway + Jonathan Ridgway8657% games−5.1% vs expected
Lisa Bartolucci + Casey Bartolucci101348% games−6.2% vs expected
Lauren Clunie + Chris Clunie123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lisa Bartolucci
97W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.27
3
Casey Bartolucci
11W–15L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
3
Jonathan Ridgway
42W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.10
Lauren Verlander
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
3
Andrea Venus
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Holly Ridgway
42W–59L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
2.5
Chris Clunie
1W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
Edgar Brewer
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Clunie
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marty Ryan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.